DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted
Unknown

Burns

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit

Biography pending scraper ingestion.

Judicial record

12 opinions where Burns sat on the panel, spanning 1992–1997.

12 Joined majority

By court

  • La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 12

By disposition

  • Affirmed 5
  • Mixed 1
  • Reversed 1

Panel votes per year

How Burns's panel-seat count has shifted year by year. Add ?vs=<another-judge-slug> to the URL to overlay a second judge, or click compare next to any co-panelist below.

0 1 2 3 4 5 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1992: 3 votes — Burns 1995: 4 votes — Burns 1997: 5 votes — Burns
  • Burns

Most-frequent co-panelists

Judges who appeared on the same opinions. aligned = same bucket (both majority, both dissent); partial = concurred in result but wrote separately; split = the meaningful disagreement (majority vs dissent).

Recent opinions

15 most recent opinions where Burns sat on the panel.

Docket Court Filed Disposition Case
97-CA-240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997-09-30 — Fridge v. Sampognaro
97-CA-91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997-09-17 Reversed and remanded Susananbadi v. Johnson
97-CA-237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997-09-17 Affirmed Pye v. Insulation Technologies, Inc.
97-CA-246 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997-09-17 Affirmed Clement v. Occidental Chemical Corp.
97-CA-125, 97-C-210, 97-C-602 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997-08-27 — City of Kenner v. Jumonville
95-CA-458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995-11-15 — Tamporello v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
95-KA-444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995-11-15 — State v. Guzman
95-CA-462 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995-10-31 — Kirkland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
95-CA-453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995-10-18 Affirmed Mayeaux v. Denny's Inc.
92-CA-234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992-09-16 Affirmed Cochran v. Travelers Ins. Co.
92-CA-275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992-09-16 Affirmed Jasmin v. St. James Parish School Bd.
92-CA-268 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992-09-16 Affirmed in part, dismissed in part Franks v. Royal Oldsmobile Co., Inc.