Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shaffer v. Shaffer, 808 So. 2d 354.

30 citing documents.

  • Lindsey Faith Richard v. William Oscar Clarke, II La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    App. 1 Cir. 9/ 13/ 00), writ denied, 2000- 2838 ( La.
  • Scott Joseph Fin v. Remy Baus Fin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 1st Cir. 9/ 13/ 00), writ denied, 2000- 2838 ( La.
  • Guidry v. Guidry 274 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 1 Cir. 9/13/00), , 357, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Harrel v. Harrel 251 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 1st Cir. 9/13/00), , 360, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Freeman v. Johnson 225 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    App. 1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 2000-2838 (La.
  • Boesch v. Boesch 210 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Tinsley v. Tinsley 211 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 1st Cir. 9/13/00), , 357 n.2, writ denied, 2000-2838 (La.
  • Bonnette v. Bonnette 185 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Rozetta Mizell v. Juston Stone La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), (Weimer, J., concurring), writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Theriot v. Theriot 177 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Joseph Albert Tarver v. Melissa Waddell Tarver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Hebert v. Schexnayder 113 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1 Cir. 9/18/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere 69 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1st Cir.9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere 37 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1st Cir.9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Harang v. Ponder 36 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 6 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , 356-357 n. 2, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Falcon v. Falcon 992 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    App. 1 Cir. 9/13/00), -357 , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • Hobbs v. Hobbs 962 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 09/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Pinegar v. Harris 961 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , -357 , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Garret Linn Leblanc v. Nichole Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), writ denied, 00-2838 (La.
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 951 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), , "[l]ife changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified."
  • Cedotal v. Cedotal 927 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , 356-357 n. 2, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Sanders v. Sanders 923 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Wages v. Wages 899 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Pender v. Pender 890 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 2000-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • D'Aquilla v. D'Aquilla 879 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Ramona Ann Marcentel Winzor v. Robert Wade Winzor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Winzor v. Winzor 856 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • White v. Kimrey 847 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Montalvo v. Montalvo 854 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), , Justice Weimer, then serving on the first circuit, recognized: “Life changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified.” Since the entry of the consent judgment, both parties have ex