Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite KLLM, Inc. v. Reed, 771 So. 2d 728.

24 citing documents.

Leroy Johnson v. Lofton Staffing Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citing Resweber v. Haroil Constr.
Debra White v. Wis International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citations omitted).
Byrle Raney v. Top Deck, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citations omitted) explains: The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are (1) a false statement or representation (2) that is willfully made (3) for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment under the workers’
Ralph Weaver v. Chicago Bridge & Iron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citations omitted) explains: The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are (1) a false statement or representation (2) that is willfully made (3) for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment under the workers’ compensation law.
The Wood Group Psn, Inc. v. Todd Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/11/00), explained “[t]he relationship between the false statement and the pending claim will be probative in determining whether the statement was made willfully for the purpose of obtaining benefits.” In KLLM, this court affirmed the WCJ’s determination that the worker willfully misrepresented his medical history a
Wood Group PSN, Inc. v. Romero 215 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/11/00), , explained “[t]he relationship between the false statement and the pending claim will be probative in determining whether the statement was made willfully for the purpose of obtaining benefits.” In KLLM , this court affirmed the WCJ’s determination that the worker willfully misrepresented his medical history and
Martha Diana Rougeau v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Rougeou v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital 107 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Beauregard Memorial Hospital v. Joy T. Barber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/11/00), this court noted: [S]tatutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy and, therefore, must be strictly construed.
Beauregard Memorial Hospital v. Barber 26 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/11/00), , this court noted: [Statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy and, therefore, must be strictly construed.
Marvin Arnaud v. Shaw Construction La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citation omitted).
Arnaud v. Shaw Construction 12 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citation omitted).
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors 879 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/11/00) , -34 .
Apeck Const., Inc. v. Bowers 862 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 10/11/00) , , this court held that issues of penalties and attorney fees are moot once forfeiture under La.
Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Anthony J. Authement La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Authement 858 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Vila Harris v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citations omitted), we offered the following analysis in applying Section 1208: 5 The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are (1) a false statement or representation (2) that is willfully made (3) for the purpose o
Harris v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 857 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 10/11/00), (citations omitted), we offered the following analysis in applying Section 1208: The only requirements for forfeiture of benefits under Section 1208 are (1) a false statement or representation (2) that is willfully made (3) for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment under the workers' compen
Morton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 830 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Bruce v. Lakewood Country Club 828 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 5/9/01), ; KLLM, Inc. v. Reed, 2000-295 (La.App 3 Cir. 10/12/00), .
Bossier Elec. v. Cubley 821 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Mendoza v. Stewart & Associates 806 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Parker v. ADM Milling Co. 804 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Gardner v. Nabors Offshore Corp. 800 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 10/11/00); .