Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 765 So. 2d 994.

15 citing documents.

Carlo Carollo, Jr., and Frank Carollo, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Carlo Carollo, Sr. and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
7/6/00), the Supreme Court explained, in pertinent part: [U]nder [La.
Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
7/6/00, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the relationship between La.
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. and Exco USA Asset, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
7/6/00), Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
07/06/00), (“Louisiana courts do not look to the settlement amount received by a plaintiff when determining the credit granted to the remaining solidary obligors”).
Daniel Hyatt v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hyatt v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. 149 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Reciprocal Exch, 00-76, p. 4 (La.7/6/00), .
Goza v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 21 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3d Cir.10/27/99), -33 , rev’d, in part on other grounds, 00-0076 (La.7/6/00), .
Reggio v. E.T.I. 15 So. 3d 951 La. 2008
Contribution rights are enforced/created by joining potential solidary obligors as third-party defendants.” Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 2000-0076, p. 4 (La.7/6/00), .
Scarbrough v. OK Guard Dogs 879 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See also Cavalier v. Cain's Hydrostatic Testing, Inc., 94-1496, p. 8 (La.6/30/95), ; Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076, pp. 3-7 (La.7/6/00), -998 ; Dennis v. The Finish Line, Inc., 99-1413, 99-1414, pp. 40-43 (La.App.
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 878 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076, p. 5 (La.7/6/00), .
Schiro v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 808 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
This conclusion, DOTD argues, is erroneous in view of the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076 (La.7/6/00), .
Schiro v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 808 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
This conclusion, DOTD argues, is erroneous in view of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076 (La.7/6/00), .
Distinguished State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Lemaire 787 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
ON REMAND The Louisiana Supreme Court remanded this case instructing us to reconsider *1016 our original opinion in light of its recent holding in Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076 (La.7/6/2000); .
Frazer v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 774 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
We have also considered whether the recent case of Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 00-0076 (La.7/6/00), , would allow the School Board to receive a credit for the fault assigned to the dismissed intentional tortfeasors.
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch., 00-0076 (La.7/6/00), .