DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 772 So. 2d 94.

194 citing documents.

  • Acker v. America First Insurance Co. 213 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/30/00), (citing Scott v. Hosp.
  • Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc., 05-257, p. 28 (La.9/6/06), -55 (quoting Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628 (La.10/30/00), -05 ).
  • Fuller v. D.L. Peterson Trust Co. 197 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), (internal citations omitted).
  • Pitts v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 197 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 2000-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (citations omitted).
  • Panfilo Carrillo v. Billy W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Autin v. Voronkova 177 So. 3d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 9/9/15), , (citing Martin v. Heritage Manor S. Nursing Home, 00-1023, p. 6 (La.4/3/01), ) (citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 15 (La.10/30/00), ).
  • Bilbe v. Foster 176 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Martin v. Heritage Manor S. Nursing Home, 00-1023, p. 6 (La.4/3/01), (citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 15 (La.10/30/00), ).
  • Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, 00-0628, pp. 14-15 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Parvin Wesley Brown, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    In Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
  • Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 166 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
  • Bourg v. Cajun Cutters, Inc. 174 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    ' This rigorous standard , is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), (citations omitted).
  • LeBlanc v. Islam 164 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    In Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), , the supreme court explained the principles to be applied in determining whether JNOV is appropriate as well as this court’s review of the granting of the JNOV: La.Code Civ.
  • McKamey v. Carona 169 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Co., 10-0051 (La.11/30/10), , citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), ; Forbes v. Cockerham, 08-762, 08-770 (La.1/21/09), ; Willis v. Meilleur, 11-705 (La.App.
  • Pollard v. Schiff 161 So. 3d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 14-15 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Ober v. Champagne 166 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Tamayo v. American National General Insurance Co. 150 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 5/8/12) , , citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), , this Court set forth the criteria to be used in determining whether JNOV is proper: JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Granger v. United Home Health Care 145 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Serpas v. Tulane University Hospital & Clinic 161 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 5/25/11), (citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, 00-0628, p. 8 (La.10/30/00), -01 ).
  • Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 140 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 5/8/12) , , citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), , this Court held: *348 JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Doris Doyle v. Liwliwa Ramos, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/30/00), (wherein the supreme court explained that, on review of a denial of a motion for JNOV, an appellate court considers whether “the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of the moving party that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict[.]”)
  • Doyle v. Ramos 134 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, p. 5 (La.10/30/00), (wherein the supreme court explained that, on review of a denial of a motion for JNOV, an appellate court considers whether “the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of the moving party that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict[.]”) DECREE For the foregoing reason
  • Kimberly Collins, Indiv., Etc. v. Louisiana State Police dept.of Public & Safety La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
  • Collins v. Louisiana State Police 158 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    |7In Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
  • LCR-M Ltd. Partnership v. Jim Hotard Properties, L.L.C. 126 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. *675 00-06328, p. 15 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Board of Supervisors v. 1732 Canal Street, L.L.C. 159 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Trunk v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans, 04-0181, p. 4 (La.10/19/04), *473 (citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), ).
  • Melissa Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    [Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), ]
  • Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA 117 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    [Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), .]
  • Provosty v. ARC Construction, LLC 119 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, p. 4 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Babin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 113 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Trunk v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans, 04-0181, p. 4 (La.10/19/04), , 537, citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), ; see also VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 01-0462, p. 11 (La.11/28/01), -39 .
  • Thistlethwaite v. Gonzalez 106 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), (citing Scott v. Hosp.
  • Marcus Broussard, Jr. v. Martin Operating Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (internal citations omitted).
  • Broussard v. Martin Operating Partnership 103 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard, Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (internal citations omitted).
  • Camille Landry v. Psa of Lafayette, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628 (La.10/30/00)
  • Landry v. PSA of Lafayette, LLC 120 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Wood v. Humphries 103 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), .
  • Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General Ex Rel. State of Louisiana v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Caldwell ex rel. State v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. 100 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 11/16/11), (quoting Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628 (La.10/30/00), ).
  • Queen Alexander, Et Ux. v. Zachary Laborde La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/30/00), ), the supreme court explained the principles to be applied in determining whether JNOV was appropriate: JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary
  • Alexander v. Laborde 97 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insurance Co., 10-51, p. 5 (La.11/30/10), (quoting Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, 08-770, pp. 4- *1086 5 (La.10/30/00), ), the supreme court explained the principles to be applied in determining whether JNOV was appropriate: JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Buckheister v. United States Environmental Services, L.L.C. 97 So. 3d 414 La. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, (La.10/30/00), .
  • Leslie Schilling v. Lynn W. Aurich, ph.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    10/30/00), ), the supreme court recently stated (emphasis added): The motion should be denied if there is evidence opposed to the motion which is of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.
  • Schilling v. Aurich 91 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insurance Co., 10-51, p. 5 (La.11/30/10), (quoting Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), ), the supreme court recently stated (emphasis added): The motion should be denied if there is evidence opposed to the motion which is of such quality and weight that reason *583 able and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.
  • Stoll v. Allstate Insurance Co. 95 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, (La.10/30/00), .
  • Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    The supreme court in Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), , noted that in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of St.
  • Steven P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Christopher P. Saucier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    10/30/00), (citing Scott v. Hosp.
  • Guillory v. Saucier 79 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628 (La.10/30/00), (citing Scott v. Hosp.
  • Elfers v. AIG National Insurance 80 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 02-0628, p. 4 (La.10/30/00), .