Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abl Mgmt. v. Board of Sup'rs of S. Univ., 773 So. 2d 131.

49 citing documents.

Esplanade Mall Realty Holdings, LLC v. Joseph P. Lopinto III, in His Capacity as Sheriff and Ex-Offico Tax … La. 2026
11/28/00), (in interpreting a statute, courts have a duty to, where possible, adopt a construction which harmonizes and reconciles it with other provisions in the applicable statutory scheme).
John Vajas v. Kevin Morris La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
11/28/00), (citation omitted).
C/W 2023-C-01118 Mayor-President Sharon Weston Broome, Lewis O. Unglesby, Lamont Cole, and M. E. Cormier v. Chris Rials … La. 2024
Kim and Stewart Wixson, Melanie and Charlie Jones, Aimee and Tommy Joe Woodard, Jr., and the Louisiana Independent … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
11/28/00), Qubre, 11-0097 at p. 11, 79 So.
Mark Jones Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
11/28/00), (quotations omitted).
Maria Navarre Versus Peristyle Residences, LLC and Luba Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
11/28/00), (quotations omitted).
Thomas Handy, Jr. Versus The Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State in the Interest of G. J. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00)
Kevin E. Bias v. Louisiana Physical Therapy Board La. 2019
It is further presumed that the legislature did not insert “idle, meaningless or superfluous language in the statute or that it intended for any part or provision of the statute to be meaningless, redundant or useless.” ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University, 00–0798 (La.11/28/00)
Wood Materials LLC v. City of Harahan 262 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agric., Inc. 258 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agriculture, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
of Sup’rs of Southern University, 2000- 0798 (La, 11/28/00)
Hornbeck Offshore Operators, LLC v. Cross Group, Inc. 207 So. 3d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Dynamic Constructors, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 173 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University, 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), , the supreme court stated that courts are to presume that “every word, sentence or provision in the statute was intended to service some useful purpose, that some effect is to be given to each such provision, and that no unnecessary words or provisions were used.” Moreover, the Legislature is “presumed to have e
Byron P. Guillory, Et Ux. v. Pelican Real Estate, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 140 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Sup’rs of S. Urdu, 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), .
Kondylis v. Strain 117 So. 3d 1255 La. 2013
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
West Monroe Firefighters Local 1385 v. City of West Monroe 111 So. 3d 330 La. 2013
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Caldwell Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Co. 110 So. 3d 993 La. 2013
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Credit v. Richland Parish School Board 85 So. 3d 669 La. 2012
ABL Mgmt., Inc., v. Board of Supevisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), .
Eddie Ray Jackson v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Jackson v. State 102 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
We must assume every word of the statute serves a purpose, because “it will not be presumed that the Legislature inserted idle, meaningless or superfluous language in the statute or that it intended for any part or provision of the statute to be meaningless, redundant or useless.” ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup’rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), ( (La.App.
Smith v. State 84 So. 3d 487 La. 2012
We must assume every word of the statute serves a purpose, because “it will not be presumed that the Legislature inserted idle, meaningless or superfluous language in the statute or that it intended for any part or provision of the statute to be meaningless, redundant or useless.” ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup’rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), (citing Bunch v. Town of St.
First National Bank, USA v. DDS Construction, LLC 91 So. 3d 944 La. 2012
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00); (when interpreting a statute, a court should give it the meaning the Legislature intended).
First National Bank, USA v. DDS Construction, LLC 92 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup’rs of Southern University, 2000-0798, pp. 5-7 (La.11/28/00), .
Marshall v. Maynard 35 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
See ABL Management v. Board of Supervisors, 2000-0798, p. 5-7 (La.11/28/00), .
Chl Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Loewer Lawn & Cycle v. State of La., Dept. of Revenue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
ABL Mgt., Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), Wimberly v. Blue, 08-1535 (La.App.
CHL Enterprises, LLC v. State, Department of Revenue 23 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
ABL Mgt., Inc. v. Board of Sup’rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), ; Wimberly v. Blue, 08-1535 (La.App.
Eric Ryan Wimberly, Et Ux. v. James Orville Blue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00)
Wimberly v. Blue 11 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup’rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Dianna Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 998 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
[15] In Hall , this Court relied upon ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University, 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), ("It is presumed that every word, sentence or provision in the statute was intended to serve some useful purpose, that some effect is to be given to each such provision, and that no unnecessary words or provisions were used.
Schexnayder v. Gish 948 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern University, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), ; Bunch v. Town of St.
Dianna Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 939 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
of Supervisors of S. Univ., 00-798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
State v. Brisco 933 So. 2d 754 La. 2006
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins.
Brenda Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
ABL Mgmt., Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00)
Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 923 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
ABL Mgmt., Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. v. Kennedy 914 So. 2d 533 La. 2005
ABL Mgmt., Inc. v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern Univ., 00-0798, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), .
Robert W. Lovett, Jr. as Administrator, Etc. v. Starr Wheat Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lovett v. Brown 879 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
See, e.g., ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), , ("It is presumed that every word, sentence or provision in the statute was intended to serve some useful purpose, that some effect is to be given to each such provision, and that no unnecessary words or provisions were used....
Barrilleaux v. Barthelemy 844 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See, e.g., ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Southern Univ., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), .
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Fitch 836 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
of Supervisors of Southern Univ., 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), : ...
Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers 835 So. 2d 460 La. 2003
v. Board of Supervisors, 00-798 (La.11/28/00), (cites omitted); La.
In Re Woods 836 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
However, in ABL Mgmt., Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 00-C-0798 (La.11/28/00), at 135 , the Supreme Court stated: ...
Hollingsworth v. City of Minden 828 So. 2d 514 La. 2002
ABL Management, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 00-0798 (La.11/28/00), ; Killeen v. Jenkins, 98-2675 (La.11/05/99), ; La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by