Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Willis v. Medders, 775 So. 2d 1049.

257 citing documents.

The Herbert and Lula Marie Fusilier Revocable Living Trust v. Enlink Ngl Pipeline Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Herbert & Lula Marie Fusilier Revocable Living Trust v. EnLink NGL Pipeline, LP 220 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Succession of Hickman v. State Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College 217 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. Energy Development Corp. 218 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Alvarado v. Lodge at the Bluffs, LLC 217 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Guidry v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 213 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Kasem v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 212 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
12/8/00), ; FMC Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Prytania-St.
Fiveash v. Pat O'Brien's Bar, Inc. 201 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Neighbors Federal Credit Union v. Anderson 196 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), (per curiam).
Fonseca v. City Air of Louisiana, LLC 196 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Bridgewater v. New Orleans Regional Transit Authority 190 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Despite the legislative mandate that summary judgments are favored, any doubt as to a | ^dispute, regarding a material issue of fact must-be = resolved against granting the motion and in favor of a trial on the merits, Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), ; FMC Enterprises, 12-1634, pp. 6-7, 117 So.3d at 222-23 ; Windham v. Murray, 06-1275, p. 3 (La.App.
Rivarde v. City of New Orleans 190 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Relying upon the Supreme Court’s holding in Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), , they argue that a “factual inference reasonably drawn from the evidence must be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion, and all doubt must be resolved in the opponent’s favor.” ^Evidence that a high-speed chase occurred is contained in the officers’ affidavits, -they argue.
Jason Kinch v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
12/8/00), (emphasis added), the supreme court explained this burden of proof in clearer terms than the language used in the code of civil procedure and more clearly pointed out how the non-moving party may meet its burden on summary judgment: [W]hen the party opposing the summary judgment motion
Kinch v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center 181 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 In Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 3 (La.12/8/00), (emphasis added), the supreme court explained this burden of proof in clearer terms than the language used in the code of civil procedure and more clearly pointed out how the non-moving party may meet its burden on summary judgment: [W]hen the party opposing the summary judgment motion submits expert opinion evi
Davis v. Cheema, Inc. 171 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 2/6/14), , citing Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Citron v. Gentilly Carnival Club, Inc. 165 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Second, “factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence must be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion, and all doubt must be resolved in the opponent’s favor.” Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Louisiana State University System Research & Technology Foundation v. Qyntessa Biologics, L.L.C. 168 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
Alberes v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 156 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/08/00), .
Schroeder v. Walgreens Family of Companies 150 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/3/04), (citing Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 1 (La.12/08/00), ).
McCorkle v. Gravois 152 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
Baldwin v. Board of Supervisors for University of Louisiana System 138 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Wellman v. Tufail 136 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Deroche v. Tanenbaum 131 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Charles L. Venable v. Austin Dejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Venable v. Dejean 127 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Though summary judgments are now favored, “factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence must be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion, and all doubt must be resolved in the opponent’s favor.” Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1 v. Thomas 129 So. 3d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
art. 966; Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/08/00), .
GE Commercial Finance Business Property Corp. v. Louisiana Hospital Center, LLC 134 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Fair Farms, Inc. v. Holt 124 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Starkey v. Livingston Parish Council 122 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Vanner v. Lakewood Quarters Retirement Community 120 So. 3d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Smith v. Kopynec 119 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Teter v. Apollo Marine Specialities, Inc. 115 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Fournerat v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 104 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), (per curiam).
Mason v. Garrett 96 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/08/2000), .
Manis ex rel. Plaisance v. Zemlik 96 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[D]espite the legislative mandate that summary judgments are favored, factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence must be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion, and all doubt *513 must be resolved in the opponent’s favor.” Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
Johnson v. Super 8 Lodge-Shreveport 92 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
Duckett v. Grambling State University 92 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/8/00), ; Knowles v. McCright’s Pharmacy, Inc., 34,559 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/01), .
Loftus v. Kuyper 87 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
1026 Conti Condominiums, LLC v. 1025 Bienville, LLC 84 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Wilson v. Bank of America 76 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Rome v. ASBESTOS 70 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 1 (La.12/8/00), , 1050: However, as this Court stated in Moody v. City of New Orleans, 99-0708, pp. 1-2 (La.App.
GE Commercial Finance Business Property Corp. v. Louisiana Hospital Center, L.L.C. 69 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), (per curiam).
Bergeron v. Argonaut Great Central Insurance Co. 64 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507 (La.12/8/00), (per curiam).
Ladner v. Trinity Group, Ltd. 57 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 00-2507 (La.12/8/00), .
Lucas v. Hopeman Bros., Inc. 60 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Summary judgments are favored and “factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence must be construed in favor of the party opposing the motion and all doubt must be resolved in the opponents’ favor.” Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. Tufts 61 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .
Brown v. Martin 53 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/16/10), (citing Willis v. Medders, 00-2507, p. 1 (La.12/8/00), (citing Independent Fire Ins.
All Crane Rental of Georgia, Inc. v. Vincent 47 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Willis v. Medders, 2000-2507, p. 2 (La.12/8/00), .