Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Merlin v. Fuselier Const., Inc., 789 So. 2d 710.

17 citing documents.

Stanley R. Palowsky, III Versus W. Brandon Cork, Anthony White, Ohc Services, L.L.C. and Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
App. 5 Cir. 5/30/01), this Court recognized that the law of comparative fault established in La.
Mathes Brierre Architects, a Professional Corporation v. karlton/isg Enterprises, LLC, International Sales Group, LLC, and J.S. Karlton Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
5 Cir. 5/30/01), (citation omitted).
State v. Thomas 192 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
*307 App. 5 Cir. 5/30/01); , stating: We -note that in Daubert, the United States Supreme Court was concerned with determining the admissibility of new techniques as a basis for expert scientific testimony.
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 5/30/01) , ; Ancoin v. S. Quality Homes, LLC, 06-979 (La.
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Donna D. Johnson, Et Ux. v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
App. 5 Cir. 5/30/01), [“Whether an expert meets the qualifications of an expert witness and the competency of the expert witness to testify in specialized areas is within the discretion of the trial court.”] A district court‟s decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.
Johnson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & Development 85 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/30/01), [‘Whether an expert meets the qualifications of an expert witness and the competency of the expert witness to testify in specialized areas is within the discretion of the trial court.”] A district' court’s decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.
Dixie Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc. v. Anita Jean Holmes Reeves Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/30/01), ]; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.
Gonzalez v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 32 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Succession of Robert Edwards, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/30/01), [“Whether an expert meets the qualifications of an expert witness and the competency of the expert witness to testify in specialized areas is within the discretion of the trial court.”] A district court’s decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.
In Re Succession of Edwards 11 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/30/01), [“Whether an expert meets the qualifications of an expert witness and the competency of the expert witness to testify in specialized areas is within the discretion of the trial court.”] A district court’s decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.
Connell v. Davis 940 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
City of Kenner v. Parker 918 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
App.5/30/01), instructive in our consideration of this issue.
Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 861 So. 2d 536 La. 2003
App. 5 Cir. 5/30/01), ["Whether an expert meets the qualifications of an expert witness and the competency of the expert witness to testify in specialized areas is within the discretion of the trial court."] A district court's decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.
Hughes v. Goodreau 836 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
App. 5th Cir.5/30/01), ; Duplechin , 95-0480 at p. 6, 665 So.2d at 84 .
Arrington v. Law Firm of Aucoin & Courcelle, L.L.C. 832 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Labadie v. Physician Network Corp. of Louisiana, Inc. 805 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002