Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mason v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 769 So. 2d 1249.

15 citing documents.

Jerry Dregin & Gretchen Dregin v. Robert Lincoln Desoto & La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Louisiana Capital Assistance Center v. Dinvaut 207 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
John Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 9/26/00), (footnotes omitted), stated the following: 4 The essential function of the exception of no right of action is to provide a threshold device for terminating a suit brought by one with no legal interest to assert it, that is, to challenge the
Taylor v. Leger Construction, LLC 34 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 9/26/00), (footnotes omitted), stated the following: | fiThe essential function of the exception of no right of action is to provide a threshold device for terminating a suit brought by one with no legal interest to assert it, that is, to challenge the plaintiffs interest in the subject matter of the suit or his lack of c
Brazan v. Brazan 973 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 9/26/00), ; Hennig v. Alltel Communications, Inc., 05-96, p. 3 (La.App.
Madisonville State Bank v. Marvin M. Glick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 9/26/00), Selber Bros., (La.App.
Madisonville State Bank v. Glick 930 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 9/26/00) , ; Selber Bros., (La.App.
Wrm v. Hcv 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W.R.M. v. H.C v. and M.J.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W.R.M. v. H.C.V. 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Hennig v. Alltel Communications, Inc. 903 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Brandon J. Mouret v. Roxsan Godeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Mouret v. Godeaux 886 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Irsch v. Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. 841 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Pavich v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 780 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001