DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 774 So. 2d 119.

121 citing documents.

  • Rider v. Ambeau 100 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    art. 2058; Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2000-0947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Thomas Lemelle v. St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    12/19/00), (citing La.Civ.Code arts.
  • Vial Rodney Johnson v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00)
  • Johnson v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 76 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
    art. 1; see Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2000-0947, p. 13 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Thompson Tree & Spraying Service, Inc. D/B/A Live Oak Landscapes v. White-Spunner Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    12/19/00), (citing La.Civ.Code arts.
  • Thompson Tree & Spraying Service, Inc. v. White-Spunner Construction, Inc. 68 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), (citing La.Civ.
  • Andrew Richard v. Robert Brasseaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Charles Weston v. M-I, L.L.C., D/B/A M-I Drilling Fluids, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Richard v. Brasseaux 50 So. 3d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Reinhardt v. Barger 15 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 00-0947, p. 4 (La.12/19/00), ; see also La.
  • Beck v. BURGUENO 996 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), ; Alexander v. *409 Cornett, 42,147 (La.App.
  • Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 00-0947, p. 13 (La.12/19/00), , corrected on other grounds, 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), , quoting Johnson v. St.
  • Royal v. Cook 984 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Sauer v. National Car Rental System, Inc. 980 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Delta Chemical Corp. v. Lynch 979 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947, pp. 13-14 (La.12/19/00), .
  • FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
    Moreover, notwithstanding the well established *315 principle that Louisiana's civilian tradition does not recognize stare decisis as an authoritative source of law, see Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), -29 , [13] this Court has stated that in deciding novel issues under the UCC, "we are authorized to consider the manner in which the courts of our sister states have decided such cases."
  • Smith v. Rocks 957 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Ledoux v. Grand Casino-Coushatta 954 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Sister Nira Ledoux v. Grand Casino-Coushatta La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Poole v. Elevating Boats, L.L.C. 956 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947, p. 27 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Atkins v. Eastover Realty, Inc. 954 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Mahbod v. Ebrahimi 947 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), -124 ; rehearing granted for correction only, 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), .
  • Kline v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES 942 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/2000), , opinion correction on rehearing, 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), , the supreme court noted that where a contract cannot be construed based on its language due to some ambiguity, then the court may look to extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent.
  • Charles Guidry v. Stabil Drill Specialist La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Guidry v. Stabil Drill Specialist 929 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    art. 966(B); Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Fremin v. Cabral 926 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), -124 ; rehearing granted for correction only, 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), .
  • Grefer v. Travelers Insurance Company 919 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Pollution Exclusions The trial court found that pollution exclusions in the Gray and TIG Group policies (and Employers Mutual) did not apply, relying on the factors set out by the Supreme Court in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp ., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), .
  • Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
    Jurisprudence constante [17] carries "considerable persuasive authority," Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947, p. 14 (La.12/19/00), , but is not the law.
  • Dave F. Aguillard v. Auction Management Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/19/00), wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that due to this state’s civilian tradition, “it is 3 only when courts consistently recognize a long-standing rule of law outside of legislative expression that the rule of law will become part of Louisiana’s custom
  • Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 884 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    See Doerr v. *1263 Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947, p. 14 (La.12/19/00), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that due to this state's civilian tradition, "it is only when courts consistently recognize a long-standing rule of law outside of legislative expression that the rule of law will become part of Louisiana's custom under Civil Code article 3 and be enforced as the la
  • David Cloud v. National Automotive Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/19/00), the supreme court held: The Civil Code is clear that if a contract does not lead to absurd consequences it will be enforced as written.
  • Cloud v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE INS. CO. 875 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Furthermore, in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-947, p. 6 (La.12/19/00), , the supreme court held: The Civil Code is clear that if a contract does not lead to absurd consequences it will be enforced as written.
  • McDermott Inc. v. Records Storage & Services, Inc. 875 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In this case, it is evident by the clear and unambiguous language of the policy that RSSI and Lasseigne only elected to purchase building and building income coverage from Lloyd’s. Although case law instructs that if any ambiguities exist, a court may look to extrinsic evidence to determine the parties’ intent, Doerr v. Mobil Oil Gorp., 00-947 (La.12/19/00), , in this case, extrinsic evidence need not be evaluated because the policy clearly and unambiguously excludes coverage for contents or per
  • Angelo Iafrate Const., LLC v. STATE, DOTD 879 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Yiannopoulos, Louisiana Civil Law System § 35, p. 53 (1977); Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 00-0947, p. 13 (La.12/19/00), .
  • Jones v. Estate of Santiago 870 So. 2d 1002 La. 2004
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/19/00), , modified on other grounds on reh'g 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), .
  • Lemoine v. Illinois National Insurance Co. 868 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2000-0947 (La.12/19/2000), , opinion correction on rehearing, 2000-0947 (La.3/16/01), , the supreme court noted that where a contract cannot be construed based on its language due to some ambiguity, then the court may look to extrinsic evidence to determine the parties’ intent.
  • Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/19/00), wherein the Court stated: The Civil Code establishes only two sources of law in Louisiana: legislation and custom.
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Instead, I consider instructive the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), , wherein the Court stated: The Civil Code establishes only two sources of law in Louisiana: legislation and custom.
  • Harrison v. RR Morrison & Son, Inc. 862 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Having made the decision to apply Louisiana law, it was error for the trial court judge not to apply the factors defining the scope of the absolute pollution exclusion as set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), ; 3.
  • Alfred Palma, Inc. v. Crane Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 2000-0947 (La.12/19/00)
  • Alfred Palma, Inc. v. Crane Services, Inc. 858 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), .
  • Miller v. Superior Shipyard and Fabrication 859 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/19/00), , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), .
  • State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. MLT CON. 849 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has overruled the Ducote decision and the current law on interpretation of these clauses is set forth in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), .
  • Marshall v. First Bank & Trust 848 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Shelton v. Standard/700 Associates, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/16/01), -65 ; Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 27 (La.12/19/00), ; Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512, p. 26 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Whitlow v. the Shreveport Times 843 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), .
  • McKittrick v. HEALTH SERVICE AND INDEM. CO. 843 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. XXXX-XXXX (La.12/19/00), (La.App.
  • Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 849 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    According to the plaintiffs, the trial court improperly applied the court's holding in Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., 98-942 (La.1/20/99); as authority, when Ducote had been overruled by Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 00-947 *538 (La.12/19/00); .
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 841 So. 2d 724 La. 2003
    I would also grant to consider the applicability to this case of our opinion in Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.12/19/00), , where Justice Victory acknowledged in dissent that the majority decision in Doerr “will make it virtually impossible to determine coverage issues by declaratory judgment or summary judgement at the outset of litigation”, a view which has particular application in this case at this juncture.
  • Miller v. SUPERIOR SHIPYARD AND FABRICATION 836 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/19/00), , modified on other grounds on reh'g, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/16/01), .