DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 773 So. 2d 694.

99 citing documents.

  • Tyson v. Thompson Home Health 59 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc. 54 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See McCarroll v. Air *1237 port Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Quinn v. Vidalia Apparel 54 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    ey fees to be awarded in a workers’ compensation case which include “the degree of skill and ability exercised by the attorney, the amount of the claim, the amount recovered for the claimant, and the amount of time the attorney devoted to the case.” Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • City of Bossier City v. Colvin 36 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; J.P.
  • Billy Jo Massingill v. Dunham Price Group, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The amount awarded rests within the discretion of the workers’ compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record.
  • Massingill v. Dunham Price Group, L.L.C. 38 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The amount awarded rests within the discretion of the workers’ compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record.
  • Gwendolyn Rochester v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    11/28/00), (footnote omitted; emphasis ours), our supreme court stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
  • Rochester v. SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 36 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), (footnote omitted; emphasis ours), our supreme court stated: In our determination of the respective rights of the employee and the attorney to the statutory attorney fees, a persuasive factor is the methodology used to calculate the amount of the statutory attorney fees.
  • Alexander v. City of Shreveport 34 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    23:1141(B); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Dugan v. St. Francis Medical Center 34 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00, ); J.P.
  • Patrick D. Johnson v. Conagra Poultry Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Johnson v. CONAGRA POULTRY CO. 26 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    ey fees to be awarded in a workers’ compensation case which include “the degree of skill and ability exercised by the attorney, the amount of the claim, the amount recovered for the claimant, and the amount of time the attorney devoted to the case.” Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • Katherine Williams v. Tioga Manor Nursing Home La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    11/28/00); and awards in similar cases, was the WCJ’s attorney fee award of only $6,500.00 unreasonably low?
  • Williams v. Tioga Manor Nursing Home 24 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3) After considering all relevant factors enunciated in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00); , and awards in similar cases, was the WCJ’s attorney fee award of only $6,500.00 unreasonably low?
  • Dowles v. Conagra, Inc. 25 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Dowles argues that McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), , provides authority prohibiting the recovery of both the contingent fee contract amount and the statutory fee award.
  • J.P. Morgan Chase v. Louis 12 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport, Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    23:1201 F(2); McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Bobbie Jeffers v. Kentucky Fried Chicken La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Jeffers v. Kentucky Fried Chicken 7 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Battle v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. 935 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; Ward v. Phoenix Operating Co., 31,656 (La.App.
  • Romero v. Garan's, Inc. 929 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • Brenda Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    11/28/00), (footnotes and citations omitted).
  • Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 923 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, pp. 9-10 (La.11/28/00), , (footnotes and citations omitted).
  • April Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 10/30/02), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 904 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 10/30/02), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • Hutchison v. Aldworth Co. 888 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Elizabeth A. Lemelle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    11/28/00), the supreme court explained that the amount of the statutory attorney fees rests within the discretion of the WCJ, provided the amount is supported by the record.
  • LeMelle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 883 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , the supreme court explained that the amount of the statutory attorney fees rests within the discretion of the WCJ, provided the amount is supported by the record.
  • Lewis v. CHATEAU D'ARBONNE NURSE CARE CTR. 870 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; Ward v. Phoenix Operating Co., 31,656 (La.App.2d Cir.2/24/99), .
  • Terrell G. Istre v. International Maintenance Co., LLP La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Istre v. International Maintenance Co. 865 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 10/30/02), (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ).
  • Frazier v. Dollar General 852 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), ; Ward v. Phoenix Operating Co., 31,656 (La.App.2d Cir.2/24/99), .
  • Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport 852 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Ardoin v. Kipling Korner Grocery 839 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    As the supreme court explained in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123, p. 9 (La.11/28/00); , 700: "The amount [of statutory attorney fees] awarded rests within the discretion of the workers' compensation judge, as long as that amount is supported by the record."
  • Hobson v. East Jefferson General Hospital 837 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Burns v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 830 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Town of Walker v. Stafford 833 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    ally, with respect to litigation expenses, we note that the Louisiana Supreme Court has held, in the context of workers’ compensation, that a statutorily-authorized award of attorney’s fees “is intended to provide full recovery, without statutory limitation, for attorney’s services and expenses in connection with the litigation.” McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 2000-1123, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), (emphasis added); see also Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 2001-0198, pp. 9-10 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Desselle v. Oaks Care Center 824 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); , 698 observed that “[t]he Legislature intended both the penalty and attorney fees authorized by La.Rev.Stat.
  • White v. Shop Rite 813 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    gard to attorney’s fees, we note the following: “[T]he amount of statutory attorney fees awarded is intended to fully compensate the employee’s attorney, thereby benefitting the employee, for his services rendered in connection with the litigation.” Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 10 (La.6/29/01); (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); .)
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 813 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Duhon v. Trend Services, Inc. 809 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Attorney's Fees Duhon contends the ALJ's award for attorney's fees is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Bryant v. JUSTISS OIL CO. 801 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the purpose for awarding statutory attorney fees: The amount awarded is intended to provide full recovery, without statutory limitation, for attorney's services and expenses in connection with the litigation....
  • Monceaux v. Tosco Marketing Co. 801 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    23:1201(F), and Claimant appeals based upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 801 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La., 01-198, p. 10 (La.6/29/01); (citing McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); .)
  • Explained Langley v. Petro Star Corp. of La. 792 So. 2d 721 La. 2001
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), , we explained the purpose of a statutory award of attorney fees in this context as follows: The amount awarded is intended to provide full recovery, without statutory limitation, for attorney's services and expenses in connection with the litigation.
  • Willis v. Alpha Care Home Health 789 So. 2d 567 La. 2001
    See also, MCCARROLL V. AIRPORT SHUTTLE, 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Lejeune v. Lawrence Habetz Roofing Co. 782 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 001123 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Burruss v. CENTRO MANAGEMENT, INC. 780 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00); , the supreme court explained that the amount of the statutory attorney fee rests within the discretion of the workers' compensation judge, provided the amount is supported by the record.
  • JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman 776 So. 2d 435 La. 2001
    See McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc., 00-1123 (La.11/28/00), (Knoll, J., dissenting).