Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Cjk, 774 So. 2d 107.

53 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.O. and E.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.M. (DOB: 07/11/06), N.M. (DOB: 04/02/07), B.M. (DOB: 01/07/09), D.M. (DOB: … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State ex rel. C. F. 222 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/28/00), ; State in Interest of J.R., 11-351 (La.App.
State ex rel. T. D. 221 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
State ex rel. J.H. 209 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
11/28/00), , 115 (citing State in the Interest of J.A., 99-2905 (La.
State ex rel. T.P. 209 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
11/28/00), ; State in Interest of E.I.R., supra.
State in the Interest of Jna, Rmd and Mpd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Code art. 1037(B); State in the Interest of C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 8 (La.11/28/00)
State ex rel. D.W. 182 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
KG., 02-2886, pp. 4-5 (La.3/18/03), -63 (citing State in the Interest of J.A., 99-2905 (La.1/12/00), -811 ; State e x rel C.J.K, 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State in the Interest of C. E., K. E., & C.E. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. C.E. 176 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 7 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State ex rel. S.A.T. 141 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
C.J.K., 2000-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. E.I.R. 130 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ; State in Interest of J.R., 11-351 (La.App.
State ex rel. C.V.W. 113 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State in the Interest of D.P.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
C.J.K., 00– 2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State ex rel. M.B. 108 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ; State in Interest of J.R., 11-351 (La.App.
State in the Interest of B.B., B.K.G. & B.G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00)
State Ex Rel. Bb 67 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. B.B. 67 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State in the Interest of J. Y. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State Ex Rel. Jym 53 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State ex rel. J.Y.M. 53 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State ex rel. H.A.S. 52 So. 3d 852 La. 2010
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ; State in the Interest of J.A., 99-2905 (La.1/12/00), -811 .
State Ex Rel. Has 52 So. 3d 852 La. 2010
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ; State in the Interest of J.A., 99-2905 (La.1/12/00), -811 .
State ex rel. H.A.B. 49 So. 3d 345 La. 2010
Code art. 1037(B); State in the Interest of C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State Ex Rel. Tr 38 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
C.J.K., 00-2375, pp. 7-8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State ex rel. T.R. 38 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
C.J.K., 00-2375, pp. 7-8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
In Re State Ex Rel. Jdp 16 So. 3d 543 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State in the Interest of Jp, Tg, Jr., Tc,jr. and Tc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00)
State ex rel. J.D.P. 16 So. 3d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State, in the Interest of Adr 11 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State in the Interest of Adr, Adr, Jr., & Mar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
In the Interest of Bog, Ddg, Kmg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00)
State ex rel. B.O.G. 5 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. D.L.R. 998 So. 2d 681 La. 2008
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State Ex Rel. Dlr 998 So. 2d 681 La. 2008
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), ) (citations omitted).
State in the Interest of S.D.G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State ex rel. S.D.G. 996 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State Ex Rel. Sdg 996 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State ex rel. D.C.P. 916 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State ex rel C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
In Re State Ex Rel. DCP 916 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State ex rel C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. W.M.O. 905 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
art. 1037(A); State in the Interest of C.J.K., 00-2375, p. 8 (La.11/28/00), , 113.
State ex rel. D.D. 898 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State ex rel.C.J.K, 00-2504, p. 7 (La.11/28/00), , 113 (citing State ex rel.
State ex rel. M.A.A. 897 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
C.J.K., 00-2375 & 00-2504, pp. 12-13 (La.11/28/00), , 116-17; La.
State ex rel. C.J.B. v. B.C.B. 843 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The supreme court explained the nature of these proceedings in State in the Interest of GJL and MML, 00-3278, p. 6-7 (La.6/29/01), , 85-86: This court recently discussed the special concerns involved in cases of involuntary termination of parental rights in State in the Interest of C.J.K and K.K., 00-2375, 00-2504 (La.11/28/00), , and State in the Interest of J.A., 99-2905 (La.1/12/00), , where we also explained that, in termination proceedings, courts must carefully balance the two private inte
State in Interest of Kg 841 So. 2d 759 La. 2003
C.J.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. K.T. 841 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
8In response, the State contends that the existence of relatives is generally irrelevant to the termination of parental rights, citing State in the interest of C.J.K., 2000-2504, p. 12 (La.11/28/00), *72 116-17 .
State in Interest of JM 837 So. 2d 1247 La. 2003
and M.M.L., 00-3278 (La.6/29/01), ; State in the Interest of J.A., 00-2375, 00-2504 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. J.M. 837 So. 2d 1247 La. 2003
and M.M.L., 00-3278 (La.6/29/01), ; State in the Interest of J.A., 00-2375, 00-2504 (La.11/28/00), .
State ex rel. L.S. 814 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
and potential ability to care for the children, the Supreme Court noted that although the DSS had sole authority to determine the children’s placement after the termination of parental rights, “the letters are relevant to the trial court’s approving placement in accordance with the best in *608 terest of the children.” State in the Interest of C.J.K and K.K., 2000-2504 pp. 12-13 (La.11/28/2000), , 117.
State ex rel. D.S.C. v. J.C.R. 811 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
and K.K., 00-2375 (La.11/28/00), , quoting State in the Interest of J.A., supra at 811.