Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Haywood, 783 So. 2d 568.

62 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Shawn Michael McKinney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Overstreet 263 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01), , 576 ; State v. Fortier , 99-0244 (La.
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01), , 582.
State v. Murray 242 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01), , 575-76, this Court, citing Sanders and Oliver , found that the police officers were justified in knocking on the hotel room door to investigate a complaint based on an anonymous tip because reasonable suspicion of criminal activity was not required for the police to knock on a door and knocking on a door did not con
State v. Johnson 224 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Mitchell 182 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. McClure 176 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Ruffin 131 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. E.J.M. 119 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bryant 110 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pollard 106 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Knocking on a door is an “age old request for permission to speak to the occupant.” State v. Haywood, 00-1584 (La.App.5 Cir.3/28/01)
State v. Collins 101 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Knocking on a door is an “age old request for permission to speak to the occupant.” State v. Haywood, 00-1584 (La.App.5 Cir.3/28/01)
State v. Ott 102 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Banks 95 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 88 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Haywood, 00-1584 (La.App.17 5 Cir. 3/28/01); .
State v. Suggs 81 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Santini 64 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Nelson 63 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Woods 38 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/28/01), , this Court stated that advice of a defendant’s sentencing range or the fact that his guilty plea may be used as a basis for filing a future habitual offender bill has never formed a part of the Boykin requirements for the entry of a presumptively valid guilty plea.
State v. Lane 38 So. 3d 413 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Lanieux 42 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Davis 31 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/28/01) , (citing State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ).
State v. Evans 30 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 28 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Marks 28 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Rogers 19 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson 996 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Bourgeois 998 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 3/28/01), -83 (this Court ultimately concluded that the error was harmless because the State presented competent evidence of the defendants' multiple offender status at a contradictory hearing).
State v. Woolridge 996 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 3/28/01), (-59 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 994 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Morton 993 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 3/28/01) , , citing Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Young 988 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Alo 984 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Wilson 984 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Bellow 982 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 3/28/01), ; State v. Fortier, 99-0244, p. 9 (La.
State v. Kennedy 974 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Nicholas 958 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 3/28/01) , (citation omitted).
State v. Severin 958 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Warren 949 So. 2d 1215 La. 2007
State v. Haywood, 00-1584 (La.App.5 Cir.3/28/01)
State v. Chauvin 945 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Leonard 945 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Roche 928 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Harris 916 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Sam 905 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005