Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eskano, 779 So. 2d 148.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. 2025
    App. 5 Cir. 1/30/01), -56.
  • State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 1/30/01) ; , the defendant argued the prosecutor made improper and prejudicial remarks about defense counsel.
  • State v. Magee 150 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/30/01), -54 ; State v. Burton, 09-0826, pp. 8-9 (La.App.
  • State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
  • State v. Henry 27 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Raymond 13 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. King 935 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jupiter 934 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , [21] Id.
  • State v. Benoit 885 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 1/30/01) , -156 , this Court set forth the pertinent law regarding jury instructions on flight: If there is testimony of flight after the crime was committed and the jury charge regarding flight is brief when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, the instruction is neither erroneous nor prejudicial.
  • State v. Gaddis 839 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    App. 5th Cir.1/30/01), .
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001