Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eskano, 779 So. 2d 148.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee
La. 2025
App. 5 Cir. 1/30/01), -56.
-
State v. Hernandez
177 So. 3d 342
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 1/30/01) ; , the defendant argued the prosecutor made improper and prejudicial remarks about defense counsel.
-
State v. Magee
150 So. 3d 446
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 1/30/01), -54 ; State v. Burton, 09-0826, pp. 8-9 (La.App.
- State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
- State v. Henry 27 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Raymond 13 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. King 935 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Jupiter 934 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
-
State v. Hensley
900 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , [21] Id.
- State v. Benoit 885 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
-
State v. Smith
864 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , -156 , this Court set forth the pertinent law regarding jury instructions on flight: If there is testimony of flight after the crime was committed and the jury charge regarding flight is brief when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, the instruction is neither erroneous nor prejudicial.
-
State v. Gaddis
839 So. 2d 1258
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
App. 5th Cir.1/30/01), .
- State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001