Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Neal, 762 So. 2d 281.

16 citing documents.

State v. Suggs 70 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/30/00) , ; and State v. Perkins, 99-1084 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/30/00), the court found that the trial court’s failure to supply written reasons for its habitual offender determination was harmless error, because the trial court’s reasons were transcribed and were a part of the record.
State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/30/00) , , the court found that the trial court’s failure to supply written reasons for its habitual offender determination was *426 harmless error, because the trial court’s reasons were transcribed and were a part of the record.
State v. Woods 38 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 5/30/00) , , the defendant was found to be a fourth felony offender.
State v. Otero 31 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jenkins 977 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Davis 829 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Jefferson 815 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 5/30/00) , ; writ denied, 00-2754 (La.6/15/01) .
State v. Knight 811 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 5/30/00) , , writ denied, 00-2754 (La.6/15/01), .
State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 5/30/00), , in which this Court found that the defendant had not made the necessary showing under Shelton when he asserted at the habitual offender hearing that he was not advised of his constitutional rights at the prior guilty pleas, but did not present affirmative evidence in support of his contention.
State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 5/3/00), , where this court affirmed the trial court finding that a mandatory life sentence for a fourth offender was constitutionally excessive, noting that the crime of theft of merchandise valued at under $300 is now a misdemeanor.
State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 5/3/00), , where this court affirmed the trial court finding that a mandatory life sentence for a fourth offender was constitutionally excessive, noting that the crime of theft of merchandise valued at under $300 is now a misdemeanor.
State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 5/30/00), ; State v. Perkins, 99-1084 (La.App.