Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Theriot, 782 So. 2d 1078.

13 citing documents.

State v. Rosales 94 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/30/01); , where this Court recognized that the judge did not make an inquiry into the defendant’s background and competency.
State v. Wetzel 54 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Dauzart 960 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Perez 930 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Perez 895 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this court found a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel in factually similar circumstances.
State of Louisiana v. Todd Durio La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 1/30/01), the fifth circuit found that the record supported a knowing and intelligent waiver, even though 7 the trial court did not inquire into the defendant’s background and competency.
State v. Durio 878 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , the fifth circuit found that the record supported a knowing and intelligent waiver, even though the trial court did not inquire into the defendant’s background and competency.
State v. Frisella 868 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Stewart 862 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Nabak 864 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , to support its position that there was a valid waiver of counsel in each of these predicate proceedings.
State v. Perez 831 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Kerwin 821 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
App. 5th Cir.1/30/01), ; State v. Pendleton, 00-1158 (La.App.
State v. Lowry 791 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir.1/30/01) , 2001 La.App.