Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wilson, 775 So. 2d 1051.

21 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Michael Glen Robinson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
12/8/00), the court upheld a frisk of a suspect where: (1) the encounter occurred in a “high narcotics trafficking area”; (2) at a late hour, the officer observed the suspect crouching near the driver’s door of a vehicle parked at the curb and engaged in some type of interaction with the driver; and (3) the suspect, upon seein
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/3/00), .
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Alvarez, 09-0328, p. 3 (La.3/16/10), ; State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/8/00), ; Morgan , 09-2352 at p. 7, 59 So.3d at 407 .
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See also State v. Wilson, 2000-0178 (La.12/8/00), , in which the court found that the extensive experience related by the police officer was sufficient to validate the investigatory stop; the officer explained why and how the race of one of the suspects factored into his suspicion that he had seen a drug transaction and also articulated several facts which also enter
State v. Brown 32 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/3/00), .
State v. Sewell 912 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
See State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), .
State v. Sam 905 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Likewise, in State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the officer's "plain feel" through defendant's jacket of the packet containing rock cocaine, which the officer immediately identified on the basis of his long experience in the field, gave him probable cause to seize the packet and to arrest the defendant.
State v. Terrick 857 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, 01-159, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Enclade 858 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, supra .
State of Louisiana v. Charles E Morris, Glenivan Cottle and Donell Badgett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
12/8/00), the supreme court held that, “[b]ecause reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop need not rise to the level of probable cause for an arrest, the police require only ‘some 11 minimal level of objective justification .
State v. Morris 854 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/8/00), , the supreme court held that, “[bjeeause reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop need not rise to the level of probable cause for an arrest, the police require only ‘some minimal level of objective justification ...’ to intrude on an individual’s right to remain free from governmental interference.
State v. Joseph 850 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, 01-159, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Sandoval 841 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
12/8/00), , 1053 per curiam, and the cases cited therein.
State v. Massey 841 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, 791 So.2d at 755 .
State v. Adams 836 So. 2d 9 La. 2003
Broussard , 00-3230 at 7-8, 816 So.2d at 1289 ; State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 4 (La.12/8/00), .
State v. Mercante 836 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Wilson, 00-0178, pp. 3-4 (La.12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, 791 So.2d at 755 .
State v. Milton 833 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Wilson, 00-0178, p. 3 (La.12/8/00), ; State v. Manson, 791 So.2d at 755 .
State v. Temple 821 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In assessing whether the police had reasonable grounds to make an investigatory stop, “[a] reviewing court must take into account the ‘totality of the circumstances — the .whole picture,’ giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer ‘that might well elude an untrained person.’ ” State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00) (per curiam), , citing State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. London 815 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), ; State v. Small, 00-0564 (La.3/24/00), .
State v. Vingle 802 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), , the court stated: We agree with the court of appeal that "the fact a white man is walking in a predominantly black high crime or drug trafficking area does not constitute reasonable cause to stop him."
State v. Howard 787 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00), , citing United States v. Trullo, 809 F.2d 108, 113-114 (1 Cir.1987), cert.