State v. Washington
Also decided on this docket: La., December 15, 2000 775 So. 2d 1066
State v. Washington, 775 So. 2d 1066 (La. 2000).
Cited by
- State v. Everett 156 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Schnyder 10 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Leonard 945 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
- State v. Flowers 880 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
- State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Kalie 699 So. 2d 879
Opinion text
775 So.2d 1066 (2000) STATE of Louisiana v. Glynn WASHINGTON. No. 00-KK-1936. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 15, 2000. PER CURIAM: Granted. The ruling of the trial court on the defendant's motion to suppress, and the court of appeal's decision affirming that order, are reversed and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. It clearly appears from the testimony at the suppression hearing that the police stopped the defendant and the passenger who was riding on the handle bars of his bicycle not only on the basis of defendant's immediate flight upon observing the officers, see Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 , 120 S.Ct. 673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000), but also on the basis of the illegal manner in which the defendant operated his bicycle by turning against traffic and peddling headlong across the paths of oncoming vehicles, nearly causing two accidents. See La. R.S. 32:194 ("Every person riding a bicycle upon a highway of this state shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this Chapters...."); La.R.S. 32:197(A) ("Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction"); see also La.R.S. 32:195(B) ("No bicycle shall be used to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped."). This combination *1067 of circumstances provided the officers with reasonable grounds to stop the defendant, see State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), 699 So.2d 879, 881 (police need only "some minimal level of objective justification") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) and their recovery of a rock of cocaine in the plastic bag which the defendant subsequently spat from his mouth where he had been concealing it from the officers then provided probable cause for his arrest. JOHNSON, J., dissents. LEMMON, J., would grant and docket.