Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abshire v. Wilkenson, 787 So. 2d 1158.

25 citing documents.

Luquette v. Allstate Insurance (Indemnity) Co. 174 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
3d Cir.5/30/01), ; Stroud v. Liberty Mut.
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/30/01), a panel of this court increased the award for medical costs and general damages to a plaintiff who was injured in an accident when leaving his chiropractor’s office where he was being treated for a pre-existing back condition.
Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 158 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/30/01) , , a panel of this court increased the award for medical *50 costs and general damages to a plaintiff who was injured in an accident when leaving his chiropractor’s office where he was being treated for a pre-existing back condition.
Ryan Breaux v. Louisiana Patients Compensation Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 5/30/01), Guilbeaux v. Hous.
Tynirsha W. Rhine v. Bayou Pipe Coating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Rhine v. BAYOU PIPE COATING 79 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Alexander Marshall v. Nathan Boydston La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Marshall v. Boydston 33 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
3 Cir. 5/30/01), , as an analogous case.
Byron P. Guillory v. Jennifer D. Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/30/01), the plaintiff had prior neck problems.
Deerfield Hunting Club, Inc. v. Swayze Plantation, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Guillory v. Lee 998 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/30/01) , , the plaintiff had prior neck problems.
Deer Field Hunting Club v. Swayze Plantat. 998 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Guilbeaux v. HOUSING AUTHOR. OF OPELOUSAS 978 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Eddie J. Guilbeaux v. the Housing Authority of the City of Opelousas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins 946 So. 2d 133 La. 2006
Joseph S. Provost, Jr. and Joanna D. Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. 901 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Fredy Rivera-Santos v. Ada Elba Melendez Rivera-Santos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/30/01), recognized the discretion afforded the trial court in cases involving expert witnesses as follows: “A trial judge has wide discretion in determining whether to allow a 7 witness to testify as an expert, and his judgment will not be disturbed by an
Rivera-Santos v. Rivera-Santos 862 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/30/01), , recognized the discretion afforded the trial court in cases involving expert witnesses as follows: "A trial judge has wide discretion in determining whether to allow a witness to testify as an expert, and his judgment will not be disturbed by an appellate court unless it is clearly erroneous."
Tadlock v. Taylor 857 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 831 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Keener v. Mid-Continent Cas. 817 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002