Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaRocca v. Bailey, 799 So. 2d 1263.
-
Succession of Ray E. Romero
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 11/7/01), (internal citations omitted).
-
In re Succession Romero
271 So. 3d 1276
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 11/7/01), , 1270 (internal citations omitted).
-
James Michael Owens v. State of Louisiana D/B/A Louisiana Community and Technical College System
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/7/01), and La.Code Civ.P.
-
Owens v. State
157 So. 3d 1225
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/7/01) , , and La.Code Civ.P.
-
State v. Foret
136 So. 3d 792
La. 2014
3rd Cir 1/7/01),2 ; City of Kaplan v. Ma- *793 yard, (La.App.
-
Sacco v. Paxton
133 So. 3d 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 11/7/01), ; Butler v. Sudderth, 2000-1950, p. 10 (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Adam Blake Waller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Auta B. Highsmith, Et Ux v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/7/01), La.Code Civ.P.
-
Highsmith v. Foret
124 So. 3d 571
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 11/7/01) , ; La.Code Civ.P.
-
Perez v. Evenstar, Inc.
91 So. 3d 288
La. 2012
3rd Cir.11/7/01),2 ; (La.App.
-
Robert Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/7/01), -71, a panel of this court discussed the conflict between the judge‟s oral reasons for judgment and a signed, written judgment, stating: What is said in open court will not take the place of a signed judgment.
-
Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc.
84 So. 3d 680
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/7/01) , -71 , a panel of this court discussed the conflict between the judge’s oral reasons for judgment and a signed, written judgment, stating: What is said in open court will not take the place of a signed judgment.
-
Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/7/01), -71, stated the following: “When the oral reasons or minute entry conflicts with the written judgment, the latter governs.
-
McFadden v. Import One, Inc.
56 So. 3d 1212
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/7/01), -71 , stated the following: “When the oral reasons or minute entry conflicts with the written judgment, the latter governs.
- Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center 980 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Wanetta Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government
963 So. 2d 378
La. 2007
App. 3rd Cir.11/7/01), ; (La.
- Buxton v. Iowa Police Dept. 952 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Marvin W. Buxton v. Iowa Police Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Carmena v. E. BATON ROUGE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
947 So. 2d 715
La. 2007
App. 3rd Cir.11/7/01), ; (La.
-
Explained
Jane Foster v. Barbara Henshaw
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/7/01), : Because this is a summary judgment case to which La.Code Civ.P.
-
Explained
Foster v. Henshaw
939 So. 2d 625
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/7/01), , 1267: Because this is a summary judgment case to which La.Code Civ.P.
- Haynes v. United Parcel Service 933 So. 2d 765 La. 2006
-
Explained
David Brown and Karen Brown v. Douglas Romero
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 3 Cir. 11/7/01), : Because this is a summary judgment case to which La.Code Civ.P.
-
Explained
Brown v. Romero
922 So. 2d 742
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/7/01), , 1267: Because this is a summary judgment case to which La.Code Civ.P.
-
Mowad v. General Motors Corp.
839 So. 2d 1089
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
8 Cir. 11/7/01); , 1270 citing Borrello v. City of Kenner, 99-420 (La.App.
- Northshore Cap. Enter. v. St. Tammany Hosp. 822 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Porter v. Porter
821 So. 2d 663
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3d Cir.11/7/01), ; Butler v. Sudderth, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.