Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dauterive Contractors, Inc. v. Landry and Watkins, 811 So. 2d 1242.

48 citing documents.

Adcock v. Wooten 180 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02), (“In cases of fraud, the ‘peremptive period’ referenced in La.
Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Darver, L.L.C. v. Burch 163 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Da uterive Contractors, (La.App.
Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/13/02), ; Lomont v. Myer-Bennett, 14-351 (La.App.
Holloway Drilling Equipment v. Eric Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/13/02), -49 (alteration in original) (citations omitted).
Holloway Drilling Equipment v. Broussard 158 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. *171 3/13/02), -49 (alteration in original) (citations omitted).
Scheuermann v. Rosch 151 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Jo Ann Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Zeno v. Nixon 133 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 3/13/02) , (holding that law firm's breach of the professional rules of conduct while trying to remedy act of missing a filing deadline did not constitute a separate act of malpractice).
Mason v. Garrett 96 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Joslyn Renee Alex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Charles Cutler v. Leah White La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Zeno v. Alex 89 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Cutler v. White 87 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Roba, Inc. v. Courtney 47 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3rd Cir.3/13/02), ; see Loewer v. Texas Gas Transmission Co., 615 F.Supp.
SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. Zeno 43 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 3/12/02), : [W]hen the action is prescribed on the face of the petition, the burden shifts to the plaintiff.
John E. Land, III v. Dennis J. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Davis v. Conroy 27 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
McKinley v. Scott 17 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/13/02), ; Arrington v. Galen-Med., Inc., 04-1235, p. 2 (La.App.
Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/13/02), ; Arrington v. Galen-Med., Inc., 04-1235, p. 2 (La.App.
Benoit v. Wooderson 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Natasha Simona A. Benoit v. James Michael Wooderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Orea v. Bryant 979 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Wong v. Hoffman 973 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Tommie Mack Granger v. J. Ogden Middleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/13/02), -61: Subsection E of La.R.S.
Granger v. Middleton 948 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/13/02), , 1260-61: Subsection E of La.R.S.
Succession of Nita Hill Stark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Re Succession of Stark 934 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Sours v. Kneipp 923 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
3d Cir.3/13/02), , our legislature, after Lima , changed the | ^prescriptive periods for legal malpractice claims by enacting LSA-R.S.
Wrm v. Hcv 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W.R.M. v. H.C v. and M.J.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W.R.M. v. H.C.V. 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Atlas Iron and Metal Company v. D. Warren Ashy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Atlas Iron and Metal Co. v. Ashy 918 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Roadhouse Bar-B-Que, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/13/02), we recognized that “[t]hough different in their operation, the relatedness of the two theories justifies application of prescription's burden-shifting principles enunciated in the jurisprudence to peremption.” Thus, “when the plaintiff’s petition is perempted on its face, the burden shifts to the plaintiff
Roadhouse Bbq v. Certain Under. at Lloyds 909 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02), , we recognized that "[t]hough different in their operation, the relatedness of the two theories justifies application of prescription's burden-shifting principles enunciated in the jurisprudence to peremption."
Glod v. Baker 899 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/13/02), -61: Subsection E of La.R.S.
Marsh Engineering Inc. v. Parker 883 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/13/02), , 1260-61: Subsection E of La.R.S.
Williams v. Webre 876 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/13/02) , ; Kennedy v. Macaluso, 99-3016 (La.App.
Bel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 845 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Robin v. Allstate Ins. Co. 844 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/13/02) , , held that both the one-year and three-year periods found in La.R.S.
PLAINVIEW AREA ASS'N INC. v. State 832 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Nolan v. Roofing Supply, Inc. 833 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Parish of Caddo v. Durham 817 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3rd Cir.3/12/02), , which noted that while continuous tortious conduct and continuous damages may suspend prescription, peremption may not be suspended.