Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite West v. G & H SEED CO., 832 So. 2d 274.

23 citing documents.

Joseph Harvey Gautreaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 8/28/02), (citations omitted) stated: “[c]ertification of a class of plaintiffs is an interlocutory ruling, may create irreparable harm to defendants, and thus justifies appellate review.
Joseph Harvey Gautreaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Cajuns for Clean Water, LLC v. Cecelia Water Corporation D/B/A Cecilia Water Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 8/28/02), (emphasis added).
Cajuns for Clean Water, LLC v. Cecelia Water Corp. 257 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 8/28/02), , 281 (emphasis added).
Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC 112 So. 3d 822 La. 2013
3 Cir. 8/28/02); ; Billieson v. City of New Orleans, 98-1232, p. 11 (La.App.
Lloyd Dwayne Reeves v. Environmental Response Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 8/28/02), this court has expressed serious reservations about first circuit‟s interpretation of La.Code Civ.P.
Reeves v. Environmental Response Services, Inc. 104 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 8/28/02) , , this court has expressed serious reservations about first circuit's interpretation of La.
Conrad v. Lamarque Ford, Inc. 13 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 8/28/02), , 291 where, in a fraud class action, the Third Circuit distinguished Banks primarily on the basis that the West case did not involve such a large number of subjective inquiries.
Thomas v. Mobil Oil Corp. 14 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 8/28/02) , , for the proposition that, “The case law holds that the fault of others, if any is an issue for damages and not liability.” However, the facts in West, which involved a class of crawfish farmers who allegedly sustained damage from an insecticide, are not even remotely related to or analogous to those of the instant c
Patrick E. Phillips, Jr. v. G & H Seed Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 8/23/02), for a thorough description of the factual background of this case.
Faith Brooks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brooks v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO. 985 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Sutton Steel & Supply v. Bellsouth Mobility 971 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Bellsouth Mobility, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Gudo v. Administrators of Tulane Educ. Fund 966 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
App. 3 Cir. 8/28/02), at 287 , the Third Circuit stated: Representative class members may sue if "[t]here are questions of law or fact common to the class."
State v. Ford Motor Co. 965 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Galjour v. BANK ONE EQUITY INVESTORS-BIDCO 935 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 8/28/03), , and Boudreaux v. State, Dep't.
Annie R.H. Rapp v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Rapp v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 926 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Betty Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., D/B/A Wal-Mart Supercenter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 870 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003