Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Weaver v. Weaver, 824 So. 2d 438.

20 citing documents.

Rozetta Mizell v. Juston Stone La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 5/29/02), Hensgens, Evans
Mizell v. Stone 181 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 5/29/02) , ; Hensgens, ; Evans, .
Willard A. Harp v. Penny Darryl Penney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/29/02), Penny is not entitled to application of the reformation rule.
Dustin Lemoine v. Jessica Rachel Brown Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/29/02), Long v. Dossett, 98-1160 (La.App.
Lemoine v. Lemoine 27 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/29/02) , ; Long v. Dossett, 98-1160 (La.App.
Garret Linn Leblanc v. Nichole Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 951 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 5/29/02), Hensgens, Evans
McCorvey v. McCorvey 916 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 5/29/02) , ; Hensgens, ; Evans, .
Fernandez v. Pizzalato 902 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 5/29/02), , in support of her position.
Gs v. Ts 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
G. S. v. T. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
G.S. v. T.S. 900 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Joshua Arrington v. Delois James Campbell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Arrington v. Campbell 898 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Brown v. Brown 877 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Ramona Ann Marcentel Winzor v. Robert Wade Winzor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/29/02), this court observed that “[t]he factors under Article 134, are just that—a series of guidelines the trial court may use in determining which parent can better provide for the best interests of the child.” When determining the best interest of the children, the trial court must weigh and balance factors favor
Winzor v. Winzor 856 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/29/02), , this court observed that "[t]he factors under Article 134, are just thata series of guidelines the trial court may use in determining which parent can better provide for the best interests of the child."
Montalvo v. Montalvo 854 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 5/29/02) , , also cited by Peter, this court had ample evidence of the mother’s poor judgment in raising her children, including testimony that she was a “sporadic” parent who was often unavailable to supervise them.
Aucoin v. Aucoin 834 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 5/29/02) ; ; Hensgens, 653 So.2d at 52 ; Evans v. Lungrin, 96-576 (La.App.