Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ratcliff v. Normand, 819 So. 2d 434.
-
Clarence Hamilton and Novelle Fleming Versus Progressive Waste Solutions of La, Inc. Xyz Insurance Company and John Doe
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Co., 47,490 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/12), Ratcliff v. Normand, 01–1658 (La.App.3d Cir.6/5/02)
- Bell Family Trust v. Vermilion Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, More or Less, Located in St. Martin Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- Mona Leblanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- LeBlanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 177 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Frost v. Carter 140 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- George Raymond Williams, M.D. v. Sif Consultants of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Williams v. SIF Consultants of Louisiana, Inc. 133 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Powell v. Craft
117 So. 3d 298
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Co., 47,-490 (La.App.2d Cir.9/26/12), ; Ratcliff v. Normand, 01-1658 (La.App.3d Cir.6/5/02), .
- Ketteringham Builders, LLC v. Austin Speni La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- In Re Succession of Wagner 993 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- MacLaff, Inc. v. Arch Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- MacLaff, Inc. v. Arch Insurance 973 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
Lowery v. Herbert
909 So. 2d 648
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/5/02), , reasoning as follows: Generally, hearsay evidence is inadmissible if objected to in a court of law because its truthfulness cannot be tested properly in the absence of the alleged utterer.
-
William T. Lowrey, Sr. v. Gregory Allen Herbert and Leslie Ellen Smith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/5/02), reasoning as follows: Generally, hearsay evidence is inadmissible if objected to in a court of law because its truthfulness cannot be tested properly in the absence of the alleged utterer.
-
Matthews v. Breaux
896 So. 2d 1146
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/5/02), ; Nitro Gaming, Inc. v. D.I.