DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Freeman, 801 So. 2d 578.

85 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. H.J.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. H.J.L. 999 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. HJL 999 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Narcisse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 12/12/01), we noted: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the cr
  • State v. FBA 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. F.B.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. F.B.A. 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Baker, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Baker 986 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. EO 980 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. E.O., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. RWW 953 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , 580: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable *133 doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. R.W.W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), : When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven
  • State v. R.W.W. 953 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , 580: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable *133 doubt.
  • State v. JL 945 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State v. Glenn 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Tell Glenn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of M. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact
  • State Ex Rel. Mm 941 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State ex rel. M.M. 941 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State v. SDG 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State of Louisiana v. S.D.G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact
  • State v. S.D.G. 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light, most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State of Louisiana v. Stanford Dewayne Staton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact
  • State v. Staton 922 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court set forth the standard for insufficiency claims: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential
  • State v. Wilson 900 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Wilson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Herron 879 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Todd 866 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/12/01), , this court held: It is the role of the fact finder to weigh the respective credibilities of the witnesses, and therefore, the appellate court should not second guess the credibility determinations of the trier of fact beyond the sufficiency | Revaluations under the Jackson standard of review.
  • State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/12/01) , , with approval: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable d
  • State v. Jack 829 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir. 12/12/01), .
  • State v. Elaire 820 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir. 12/12/01), .