Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 792 So. 2d 126.

33 citing documents.

State v. Lyles 263 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 7/30/01), , 129-32 ; State v. Windham , 98-100 (La.
State v. Dean 140 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Holmes 106 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court found that a multiple offender sentence was valid when the commitmeni/min-ute entry reflected that the defendant’s original sentence was vacated, but the transcript failed to indicate that the trial judge had done so.
State of Louisiana v. Justin James Badeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, 1999-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. McMillan 30 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, 1999-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Roberts 996 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Taylor 956 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Hebert 930 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Williams 924 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Robinson 905 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Muhammad 880 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court held that the failure of the trial court to advise the defendant of his right to a trial and to remain silent was harmless error where the multiple offender status was established by competent evidence offered by the State at the hearing, rather than by admission of the defendant.
State v. Taylor 880 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson 864 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , and State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
State v. Staggers 860 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Bright 860 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Campbell 859 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , reh’g denied; State v. Morgan, 96-588 (La.App.
State v. Parker 853 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir.1992), overruled on other grounds in State v. Davis, 01-123 (La, App. 5 Cir. 7/30/01), , this Court held that the failure of the trial court to advise the defendant of his right to a trial and to remain silent was harmless error where the multiple offender status was established by competent evidence offered by the State at the hearing, rather than by admission of the defendant.
State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , in which this court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/31/00), , and deviated from its long held practice of vacating the multiple offender sentence as null and void and remanding the case to the district court for the purpose of vacating the original sentence and resentencing def
State v. Triche 848 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Evans 844 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Parker 845 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Brooks 841 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this court held that the failure of the trial court to advise the defendant of his right to a trial and to remain silent was harmless error where the multiple offender status was established by competent evidence offered by the state at the hearing, rather than by admission of the defendant.
State v. Simmons 839 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , and State v. Cushinello, 01-109 (La.App.
State v. Conner 833 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Flagg 815 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Knight 811 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Cushinello 792 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001