Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Steele, 829 So. 2d 541.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Shawn Michael McKinney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 9/30/02), writ denied, 02-2992 (La.
  • State v. Haydin 235 So. 3d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 5 Cir. 9/30/02), , unit denied, 02-2992 (La.
  • State v. Bradstreet 196 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), (citing State v. Balser, 96-443 (La.App.
  • State v. Crawford 166 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), ).
  • State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 9/30/02), , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 9/30/02), , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), .
  • State v. Bannister 88 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), .
  • State v. Reed 88 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), , (La.App.
  • State v. Nailor 78 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), .
  • State v. Hines 52 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5th Cir.9/30/02), -50 , writ denied, 2002-2992 (La.9/19/03), (“The remarks by the prosecutor in closing were not made to suggest that the defendant failed to testify at trial but to counter the defense suggestion that the shooting was in self-defense ....
  • State v. Brown 968 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), .
  • State v. Barbarin 900 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), (La.App.
  • State v. Hall 889 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03), , wherein this *1039 Court stated: [T]he law in this circuit is that the defendant, in a non-homicide case, has the burden to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he acted in self-defense.
  • State v. Taylor 874 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2992 (La.9/19/03) , when this court stated that; .....the law in this circuit is that the defendant, in a non-homicide case, has the burden to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he acted in self-defense.
  • State v. Rogers 850 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 9/30/02) , ; State v. Wilson, 00-1378, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Esteen 846 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003