Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Karam, 834 So. 2d 1003.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Morgan E. Douglas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 7/31/02), the trial court ordered Karam to pay counseling costs to the victims’ families as part of his sentences for 15 three counts of first-degree murder.
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Kennedy Mallette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 7/31/02), and State v. Joseph, 05-186 (La.App.
State v. Mallette 193 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 7/31/02) , and State v. Joseph, 05-186 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Wesley James Monroe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), cert.
State v. Monroe 165 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Devin Delacerda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 7/31/02), this court concluded that motion hearings held during the pendency of a sanity commission were harmless error[s], as the hearings did not prejudice defendant.
State v. Delacerda 140 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 3 Cir. 7/31/02), , this court concluded that motion hearings held during the pendency of a sanity commission were harmless error[s], as the hearings did not prejudice defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 7/31/02), hearings on several motions were held in the interim between the appointment of a sanity 5 commission and the determination that the defendant was found competent to proceed to trial.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 3 Cir. 7/31/02), , hearings on several motions were held in the interim between the appointment of a sanity 1 (¡commission and the determination that the defendant was found competent to proceed to trial.
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 7/31/02), (citing State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 16 (La.4/11/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Rideau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 7/31/02), to support his position that Rideau was not entitled to attack the specific charges or to object to the reasonableness of the amounts prior to assessment against him.
State v. Rideau 943 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 7/31/02) , , to support his position that Rideau was not entitled to attack the specific charges or to object to the reasonableness of the amounts prior to assessment against him.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Celestine, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lane Francois, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 7/31/02), this court concluded that motion hearings held during the pendency of a sanity commission were harmless error, as the hearings did not prejudice defendant.
State v. Francois 926 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 7/31/02) , , this court concluded that motion hearings held during the pendency of a sanity commission were harmless error, as the hearings did not prejudice defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 7/31/02), (La.App.
State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006