Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 839 So. 2d 1095.

81 citing documents.

State v. Creamer 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Larry Allen Creamer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01 (citations omitted).
State v. Scott 975 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Kevin L. Stinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01 (citations omitted).
State v. Hicks 977 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/5/03), , 1100-01: The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Jessie J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01: 3 The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Betty Findlay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Findlay 949 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Nicodemus L. Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Sigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01: The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Alan D. Simmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Sigue 940 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), , 1100-01: The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State v. Bordelon 929 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ,1100-01: The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Karl Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), : The trial court may also consider other factors not provided by La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Thibodeaux 924 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), , 1101: The trial court may also consider other factors not provided by La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Michael K. Moreau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Moreau 918 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Paul E. Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Day 915 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Theriot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Theriot 893 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Spencer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03), (noting the substantial benefit the defendant received through a plea agreement in finding his sentence was not excessive).
State v. Spencer 888 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , (noting the substantial benefit the defendant received through a plea agreement in finding his sentence was not excessive).
State of Louisiana v. Adam Poirrier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Poirrier 888 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Damien D. Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03), this court stated: The trial court must state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Cordell Kendrick Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/5/03), a panel of this court discussed the impact of a plea bargain upon the sentencing process, stating that: The trial court may also consider other factors not provided by La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Williams 875 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 3 Cir. 3/5/03), , a panel of this court discussed the impact of a plea bargain upon the sentencing process, stating that: The trial court may also consider other factors not provided by La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01, we stated as follows: La.
State v. Collins 865 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -01 , we stated as follows: La.
State v. Moore 847 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by