DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services, 834 So. 2d 642.

25 citing documents.

  • Brandon Broussard v. Structural Preservation Systems,llc New Hampshire Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03- 367 (La.
  • Ralph Weaver v. Chicago Bridge & Iron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Andrews v. Thrasher Construction Co. 184 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3d Cir.12/27/02), , writ denied, 03-0367 (La.4/21/03), ; see also Blanchard v. Federal Express Corporation, 95-0349, p. 13 (La.App.
  • John Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash 126 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), , a panel of this court held that termination in and of itself, or without cause, does not destroy a claimant’s entitlement to SEB.
  • Brenda Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 100 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), ], provides us guidance in this case.
  • Johnette Wilzcewski v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Wilzcewski v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 59 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), -647 , unit denied, 2003-0367 (La.4/21/03), , appears the following: However, in the present case the WCJ did not articulate the evidentiary facts she relied upon for her conclusion that an accident did not occur, nor did the WCJ articulate the facts she relied upon to conclude that Palmer did not su
  • Slater v. Mid-South Extrusion 989 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    3d Cir.12/27/02), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/21/03), , in which videotapes showed "some variance" between a claimant's testimony and the activities shown on the videotapes.
  • Yvonne Grillette v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Grillette v. Alliance Compressors 923 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), , and Lacaze, which coincidently involves the same employer, for the proposition that the termination of employment does not destroy that employee's entitlement to SEB.
  • Tina Palmer v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Palmer v. Alliance Compressors 917 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), , and Lacaze, which coincidently involves the same employer, for the proposition that the termination of employment does not destroy that employee's entitlement to SEB.
  • Distefano v. B & P CONST., INC. 874 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • Calithia S. Thomas v. Westaff, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), -50, writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Thomas v. Westaff, Inc. 874 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , -50 , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/0/03), , this court stated the following with respect to a claimant’s entitlement to SEBs: Integral to an employee’s claim for SEBs is his proof by a preponderance of the evidence that he is disabled due to a work-related injury that rendered him unable to earn nine
  • Lacaze v. Alliance Compressors 870 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-0367 (La.4/21/03), , provides us guidance in the instant case.
  • Danuta Lacaze v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-0367 (La.
  • Donna M. Phillips v. Diocese of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, 03-367 (La.
  • Phillips v. Diocese of Lafayette 869 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, 03-367 (La.4/21/03), , we found that variances between the plaintiff's testimony and video surveillance of his activities did not support a finding of fraud, where the plaintiff testified that he has good days and bad days and that he suffers great pain when he exceeds his physical limitat
  • Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Anthony J. Authement La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/27/02), writ denied, (La.
  • Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Authement 858 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) , , writ denied, in support of the proposition that his misstatements do not fall within the scope of fraud contemplated by La.R.S.
  • Gaspard v. Dollar General Corp. 842 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 12/27/02) ; -51 , we stated the following with respect to a claimant’s entitlement to SEBs: Integral to an employee’s claim for SEBs is his proof by a preponderance of the evidence that he is disabled due to a work-related injury that rendered him unable to earn ninety percent of his pre-injury wages.