Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bradley, 844 So. 2d 115.

21 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Blaine Keith Lecompte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Terrance Darnell Calloway La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 3/11/03), , 118.
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
.Because the majority of the procedural history is not evident in the instant record, it is noted that pursuant to Rule 2-1.14 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal (URCA) and State v. Bradley, 02-1130 (La, App. 5 Cir. 3/11/03), , Mr. Victor’s previous writ application, 10-K-892, was reviewed.
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 3/11/03) , , defendant’s previous writ application, 10-K-892, was reviewed.
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
App. 5 Cir. 3/11/03), defendant's previous writ application, 10-K-892, was reviewed.
State of Louisiana v. Gabe McKeel, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 3/11/03), the fifth circuit explained: We do note that LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. McKeel 153 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 3/11/03), , the fifth circuit explained: We do note that LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Yelverton 156 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Miller 84 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Caulfield 67 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 3/11/03) , , writ denied, 01-1973 (La.6/14/02), .
State v. Mire 44 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/11/03), -18 , writ denied, 01-1973 (La.6/14/02), .
State v. Fontenberry 27 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 8 So. 3d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 3/11/03) , , writ denied, 2001-1973 (La.6/14/02), .
State v. Wallis 871 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 03/11/03), , the court concluded in obiter dicta that the failure to articulate specific reasons for imposing a consecutive sentence does not require remand if the record provides an adequate factual basis to support a consecutive sentence.
State v. Blanchard 861 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003