Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fairley, 822 So. 2d 812.
- State of Louisiana Versus Odell Lee Robertson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
Christina Lambert Versus Christopher Stinson, Warden, Louisiana Transitional Center for Women
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02), writs denied, 03-1427 (La.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Abraham Aguilar
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02), writs denied, 03-1427 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Jacob Cobb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
-
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir. 6/26/02), the defendant received a sentence of five years at hard labor for his conviction for possession of cocaine.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ezikel Ruben, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5 Cir. 6/26/02), the defendant received five years at hard labor on a conviction for possession of cocaine.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Corey Woods
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02), writs denied, 03-1427 (La.
-
State v. Taylor
258 So. 3d 217
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 6/26/02), , 816, writ denied , 03-1427 (La.
-
State v. Simmons
136 So. 3d 358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , , writs denied, 03-1427 (La.4/23/04), and 08-2581 (La.1/30/09), .
-
State v. Wise
128 So. 3d 1220
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , *1230 816 , writs denied, 03-1427 (La.4/23/04), and 08-2581 (La.1/30/09), .
- State v. Kiger 128 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
- State v. Ohlsson 115 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Casimer
113 So. 3d 1129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , , writs denied, 03-1427 (La.4/23/04), and 08-2581 (La.1/30/09), .
-
State v. Bruce
102 So. 3d 1029
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , ; and State v. Pettus, 10-777 (La.App.
- State v. Pettus 68 So. 3d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
-
State of Louisiana v. Henry D. Gilmore
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 6/26/02), received five years at hard labor on a conviction for possession of cocaine.
-
State v. Gilmore
54 So. 3d 146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , , received five years at hard labor on a conviction for possession of cocaine.
- State v. Blazio 44 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Smith 43 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Lewis 43 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
- State v. Woods 38 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Wilson 30 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Addison 10 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
-
State v. Jackson
985 So. 2d 246
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 6/26/02), , 815-16 and State v. Hill, 33-322, pp. 2-3 (La.App.
- State v. Armstead 980 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
-
State v. Lagarde
960 So. 2d 1105
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , ; State v. Pierce, 02-1267 (La.App.
- State v. Ducote 927 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
State v. Morton
910 So. 2d 973
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/26/02), -816 , this Court concluded that sentencing the defendant who pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine to five years imprisonment was not constitutionally excessive, given the fact that the defendant was 42-years-old and had a prior felony conviction for armed robbery.
-
State v. Shannon
902 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , , upholding a sentence where the record supported the sentence, despite the trial court’s failure to state any reasons for the sentence imposed.
-
State v. Uloho
875 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 6/26/02) , , upholding a sentence even though the trial court failed to state any reasons for the sentence imposed where the record supported the sentence.
- State v. Crawford 873 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
- State v. Favorite 862 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Fortino 837 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Pierre 834 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002