Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 858 So. 2d 830.

21 citing documents.

Roy v. Schilling Distributing Co. 156 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Charlotte Franklin v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Franklin v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 108 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
St. Landry Parish Government v. Anthony Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
St. Landry Parish Government v. Rubin 105 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
George R. Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation 2 omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC 92 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 11/5/03), the claimant failed to file a pre-trial statement.
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 11/5/03), the claimant failed to file a pre-trial statement.
Michael C. Parrish v. Van Tel Communications La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), -35: 4 Hearing Rule 6201 provides that only those issues listed in the pre-trial statements shall be litigated at trial, except by written order of the WCJ for good cause or by agreement of the parties.
Parrish v. Van-Tel Communications 967 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), , 834-35: Hearing Rule 6201 provides that only those issues listed in the pre-trial statements shall be litigated at trial, except by written order of the WCJ for good cause or by agreement of the parties.
Terry L. Derouen v. Iberia Sugar Cooperative, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
Derouen v. Iberia Sugar Co-operative, Inc. 918 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (citation omitted), we stated that “because statutory forfeiture is a harsh remedy, it must be strictly construed.
Peters v. Ruskin Mfg. 899 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Linda Faye Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 893 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Moran v. G & G CONST. 897 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3rd Cir.11/5/03), -835 .
Eugene Wells v. Dunham Price, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wells v. Dunham Price, Inc. 883 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Terrell G. Istre v. International Maintenance Co., LLP La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03), this court recently affirmed a judgment in favor of a claimant who had sustained an unwitnessed accident, notwithstanding inconsistencies in the medical records and testimony from two co-workers that the claimant had reported being injured at home to them.
Istre v. International Maintenance Co. 865 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03) , , this court recently affirmed a judgment in favor of a claimant who had sustained an unwitnessed accident, notwith *968 standing inconsistencies in the medical records and testimony from two co-workers that the claimant had reported being injured at home to them.