Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vintage Contracting v. Dixie Bldg. Material, 858 So. 2d 22.

25 citing documents.

Commercial Chemical Products, Inc. D/B/A Poolsure Versus Jake's Towing, L.L.C., and Axis Capital Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 5 Cir. 9/16/03), -29 (recognizing that the exclusion contained in Section A(2)(j)(6) excludes coverage to property that must be repaired or replaced because the insured’s work was incorrectly performed on it); Dorsey v. Purvis Contracting Grp., L.L.C., 17-369 (La.
Dorsey v. Purvis Contracting Grp., LLC 236 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 9/16/03), , 28 (quotations omitted); Breaux v. St.
Cambre v. St. John the Baptist Parish 119 So. 3d 73 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Noto v. Noto 41 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Schurr v. O'DWYER 22 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Chicago Property Interests, L.L.C. v. Broussard 8 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Godwin v. City of Alexandria 983 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Mary Godwin v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Tara Bruckbauer v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In Vintage, the court also stated: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed employing the general rules of interpretation set forth in the Louisiana Civil Code.
BRUCKBAUER v. State 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In Vintage, , the court also stated: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed employing the general rules of interpretation set forth in the Louisiana Civil Code.
Oreman v. Oreman 971 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Stewart Contractors v. Metalpro Indus. 969 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Supreme Services v. Sonny Greer, Inc. 958 So. 2d 634 La. 2007
5 Cir. 9/16/03) , , where the court of appeal found that the CGL policy excluded coverage for the damages alleged.
Hayne v. Woodridge Condominiums, Inc. 957 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Sauviac v. Dobbins 949 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 9/16/03) , , 25: An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed employing the general rules of interpretation set forth in the Louisiana Civil Code.
Davis v. Conroy 942 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Guidry v. Lee Consulting Engineering, Inc. 945 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Alvarez v. Clasen 946 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Jenniskens v. Parish of Jefferson 940 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Supreme Services and Specialty Co., Inc. v. Sonny Greer, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 9/16/03), which held that almost identical exclusions prohibited coverage.
Supreme Servs. and Spec. Co. v. Sonny Greer 930 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 9/16/03) , , which held that almost identical exclusions prohibited coverage.
Hemstad v. Jefferson Parish School Board 916 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC 879 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 9/16/03), , *835 27.
Clulee v. Bayou Fleet, Inc. 875 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 9/16/03) , ; Newby v. Jefferson Parish School Board, 99-98 (La.App.
Irvin v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003