Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rhea, 868 So. 2d 863.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Jerman Neveaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), regarding integral act evidence: The test for integral act (res gestae) evidence is, therefore, not simply whether the State might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), a defendant prosecuted for attempted second degree murder argued that evidence of other crimes, including kidnapping, should have been excluded as unduly prejudicial.
State v. Acevedo 273 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), , 867 : The test for integral act ( res gestae ) evidence is, therefore, not simply whether the State might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the State's case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, "with power not only to support conclu
State of Louisiana Versus Marvin S. Acevedo La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), : The test for integral act (res gestae) evidence is, therefore, not simply whether the State might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the State’s case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, “with power
State v. Davis 269 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), , 867, this Court recognized: The test for integral act (res gestae) evidence is, therefore, not simply whether the State might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the State's case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, "with power not on
State v. Aguliar-Benitez 260 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), , 870 ).
State v. Garcie 242 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 2/23/04), , 867 : The test for integral act (res gestae) evidence is, therefore, not simply whether the State might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive the State's case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, "with power not only to support conclusi
State v. Besse 83 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/23/04) , (citing State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 186 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Douglas 80 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/23/04) , (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 187 , 117 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/23/04), (the trial court’s imposition of a fifty-year sentence on the defendant convicted of attempted second degree murder was not an abuse of discretion); State v. Ross, 42,399 (La.App.
State v. Morris 63 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/23/04) , (the trial court’s imposition of a fifty-year sentence on the defendant convicted of attempted second degree murder was not an abuse of discretion); State v. Ross, 42,399 (La.App.
State v. Bennett 63 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 2/23/04) , (citing State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), , quoting Old Chief v. United *258 States, 519 U.S. 172, 187 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Pearson 975 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Warmack 973 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Davis 911 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 2/23/04) , (citing State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), , quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 187 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Taylor 892 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 888 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004