Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Onstead, 875 So. 2d 908.

20 citing documents.

State v. Lewis 260 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 5/26/04), ; State v. Dale , supra .
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Kennedy Mallette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 5/26/04), and State v. Rideaux, 05-446 (La.App.
State v. Mallette 193 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 5/26/04) , ; and State v. Rideaux, 05-446 (La.App.
State v. Dale 180 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Daniels 176 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. J.M. 189 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/26/04), appeal after remand, 05-410 (La.App.
State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/26/04) , , appeal after remand, 05-410 (La.App.
State v. Anderson 91 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 5/26/04), (footnote omitted), “[a]lthough the usual scenario may be that the offender is related to the victim or lives in the home, the statute does not mandate these circumstances.” As an example of such a circumstance, the Onstead court referenced this court’s opinion in State v. Davis, 97-331 (La.App.
State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 5/26/04), (footnote omitted), “[ajlthough the usual scenario may be that the offender is related to the victim or lives in the home, the statute does not mandate these circumstances.” As an example of such a circumstance, the Onstead court referenced this court’s opinion in State v. Davis, 97-331 (La.App.
State v. Miller 982 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 5/26/04), , in which this Court remanded in order for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing "solely to determine whether or not [the defendant] affirmatively waived his right to a jury trial."
State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Delaney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Onstead 922 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Theddeus Rideaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 5/26/04), the fifth circuit found that the defendant, who had been convicted of molestation of a juvenile, used his influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the 7 nine-year-old victim to molest her.
State v. Rideaux 916 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 5/26/04) , , the fifth circuit found that the defendant, who had been convicted of molestation of a juvenile, used *494 his influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the nine-year-old victim to molest her.
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 5/26/04), the court noted that “[a]lthough the usual scenario may be that the offender is related to the victim or lives in the home, the statute does not mandate these circumstances.” Id.
State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 5/26/04) , , the court noted that "[a]lthough the usual scenario may be that the offender is related to the victim or lives in the home, the statute does not mandate these circumstances."
State v. Lokey 889 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004