DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Olivieri, 860 So. 2d 207.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    5 Cir. 10/28/03), and State v. Pierce, 11-320 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Randal Eakins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Delcome David Evans La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • State v. Montero 263 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
    App. 5 Cir. 10/28/03), , 218 ; see also La.
  • State v. White 259 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 5 Cir. 10/28/03), , 219, where this Court found the defendant's enhanced sentence had to be vacated because the trial court failed to specify that the defendant was a third felony offender thereby rendering his enhanced sentence indeterminate and required a remand for the trial court to determine or clarify the number of felonies prove
  • State v. Rodgers 202 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thompson 202 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 5th Cir. 10/28/03), .
  • State v. Duong 148 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , ; State v. Longo, 08-405 (La.App.
  • State v. Lyons 134 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , -15 .
  • State v. Kiger 128 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
  • State v. Lestrick 128 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , , the defendant challenged the comment made by the State in its opening statement referencing defendant’s post-arrest silence.
  • State v. Greenup 123 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    App. 5 Cir. 10/28/03), ; See also La.
  • State v. Trim 107 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Dalcourt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Williams 91 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Pierce 80 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Harris 83 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Barnes 92 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , (evidence of the defendant’s pri- or conviction for forcible rape was admissible under La.
  • State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Williams 28 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Allen 5 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , , the defendant challenged the comment made by the State in its opening statement referencing defen *279 dant’s post-arrest silence.
  • State v. Longo 8 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , (citing State v. Jones, 94-0926 (La.App.
  • State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Buckenberger 984 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. M. R. U. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Blume 939 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Humphries 927 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    5th Cir.10/28/03), , the court stated: Under LSA-C.E.
  • State v. Valentine 929 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , , the defendant challenged the comment made by the State in its opening statement referencing defendant’s post-arrest silence.
  • State v. Patterson 922 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 10/28/03), the fifth circuit compared Article 412.2 to Federal Rule of Evidence 413 inasmuch as the supreme court has noted that the two are similar.
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , , the fifth circuit compared Article 412.2 to Federal Rule of Evidence 413 inasmuch as the supreme court has noted that the two are similar.
  • State v. Williams 902 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Mutz 896 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 10/28/03), here the record indicates the jury was confused and the evidence may have been presented in such a manner so as to cause confusion when the facts of the 1987 conviction were read to the jury just prior to the victim’s testimony.
  • State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 10/28/03) , , here the record indicates the jury was confused and the evidence may have been presented in such a manner so as to cause confusion when the facts of the 1987 conviction were read to the jury just prior to the victim's testimony.
  • State v. Lee 868 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004