DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fletcher, 845 So. 2d 1213.

23 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Curtis Cheley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Cheley 270 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Luckett 236 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 5 Cir. 4/29/03); , 1222.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Weldon Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), held that “a trial court is in substantial compliance with the sentencing directives of the multiple offender statute if the court does not affirmatively suspend any portion of the enhanced sentence or impose any probationary period, despite the failure to state the above restrictions.” The defendant
  • State v. Thompson 123 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), , held that “a trial court is in substantial compliance with the sentencing directives of the multiple offender statute if the court does not affirmatively suspend any portion of the enhanced sentence or impose any probationary period, despite the failure to state the above restrictions.” The defendant also argu
  • State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Morgan 15 So. 3d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), -19 , citing North Carolina v. Pearce, supra.
  • State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Dauzart 960 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Francois 945 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), , and State v. Qutoum, 02-780, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Craig Francois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), and State v. Qutoum, 02-780, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 916 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. McCloud 901 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jackson 892 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), , and State v. Qutoum, 02-780, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 888 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 4/29/03), , ( (La.
  • State v. Packnett 873 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Allen 868 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Converse 864 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 4/29/03) , , (La.
  • State v. Triche 864 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003