Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 864 So. 2d 645.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir. 12/9/03), this Court, relying on State v. Robinson, [ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Uganon Sha Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir. 12/9/03), this Court, relying on State v. Robinson, concluded that defendant had not made a showing of exceptional circumstances to justify a downward departure from the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Statute when the defendant sought a downward departure on the grounds th
State of Louisiana v. Elijah Mealancon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 5 Cir. 12/9/03), (where the defendant—who filed a motion for reconsideration of sentence claiming he was entitled to a downward departure from a mandatory minimum sentence but failed to raise a specific claim that such a departure was warranted based on the non-violent nature of the underlying offense and predicate offenses—w
State v. Williams 88 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Lobo 77 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/9/03) , , in support of his argument.
State v. Flores 66 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cambrice 64 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 12/9/03) , (citing State v. Stec, 99-633 (La.App.
State v. Bruce 54 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Young 984 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
App. 5 Cir. 12/9/03), ; State v. Bailey, 04-85 (La.App.
State v. DERKINS 966 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Jones 927 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Young 926 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Young 926 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Young 902 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 12/9/03) , , this Court, relying on State v. Robinson, [8] concluded that defendant had not made a showing of exceptional circumstances to justify a downward departure from the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Statute when the defendant sought a downward departure on the grounds that the amount of narcotic
State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Singleton 871 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir. 12/9/03), , For the above discussed reasons, the defendant's conviction and sentence are affirmed.