Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stewart, 862 So. 2d 1271.

22 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Montrey Trevell Paige La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 5th Cir. 12/ 20/ 03), - 77, wherein the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld an increased sentence after the defendant failed to appear at his previously set sentencing date.
State Of Louisiana v. Montrey Trevell Paige La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 5th Cir. 12/ 20/ 03), - 77 ( wherein the defendants answered " Yes, sir," when asked if they understood that their sentence would be different if they failed to appear as scheduled for sentencing during their respective guilty plea colloquies).
State of Louisiana v. Elmer Pleasant, Jr. Convictions Affirmed; Sentences Vacated; Remanded. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State v. Jackson 259 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 12/30/03), , 1277-78.
State v. Nicholas 196 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
sentencing); State v. Stewart, 03-976 (La.App, 5 Cir. 12/30/03), (where this Court found that defendant acknowledged that he would | nreceive a greater sentence if he failed to appear for sentencing and that the trial court did not err in imposing a greater sentence after defendant failed to appear).
State v. Ellison 121 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , , this Court held that the trial judge did not err in imposing a sentence not in accordance with the original plea agreement.
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Bryan Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Guilbeau 52 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , ; State v. Dixon, 03-382 (La.App.
State v. Roche 39 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 12/30/03), , this Court found that the defendant was precluded from raising a claim for excessiveness of sentence on appeal because he was sentenced in conformity with a plea agreement.
State v. Davenport 28 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 5 Cir. 12/30/03), , the defendant argued that his enhanced sentence was constitutionally excessive because the crimes he committed were nonviolent offenses, and his drug problem should have warranted a lesser sentence.
State v. Scott 8 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , -78 .
State v. Kron 983 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Cross 958 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , , in arguing that the defendant is precluded from appealing his sentence as excessive, because his sentence was imposed in conformity with his plea agreement.
State v. Collins 951 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Jones 927 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Goodwin 908 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Ebright 894 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 12/30/03) , , this court addressed a similar issue raised by the defendant in the instant appeal.