DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Butler v. DePuy, 876 So. 2d 259.

28 citing documents.

  • Rene' Owens v. Dr. Ruth L. Smothers, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, but rather he must point out that there
  • Elmo v. Davis, Jr. v. Jimmy R. Fortenberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, but rather he must point out that there is
  • Davis v. Fortenberry 37 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, but rather he must point out that there is an absence of factual support for one or
  • Parker v. University Medical Center 30 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/9/04)], (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Crochet v. Nguyen 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party's claim, but rather he must point out that there is an absence of factual support for one or
  • Percy Joseph Crochet v. Dr. Lam Nguyen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party's claim, but rather he must point out that there is
  • Cleotter Simien, Et Ux. v. Medical Protective Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Simien v. Medical Protective Co. 11 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we noted: [I]f the mover will not bear the burden of proof at trial, he need not negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, but rather he must point out that there is an absence of factual support for one or
  • Eric Navarre, Et Ux. v. Southwest Contractors, Lld. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Shannon J. Clement v. Dusty Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Clement v. Reeves 975 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Kenyetta M. Brooks v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    App. 3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Brooks v. Christus Health Southwestern La. 954 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 6/9/04) , (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Dora Thompson Brown v. Riverland Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Butler, (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Brown v. RIVERLAND MEDICAL CENTER 952 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Butler [v. DePuy], [(2004)] (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Earline Thierry, Et Vir. v. State of La., Thru the Dept. of Health & Hosp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing 5 Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Explained Thierry v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals & University Medical Center of Lafayette 948 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing 6Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Simon v. Biddle 946 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04) ], (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Latisha Simon v. Dr. Johnny R. Biddle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04)], (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Rebecca Brown v. State of La., Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • George & Tina Vaughan v. Sanders Vision Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04)], (citing Davis v. Atchison, 37,832 (La.App.
  • Brown v. State 942 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Explained Williams v. Roberts 931 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), ( citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ), we explained: The initial burden of proof remains with the mover to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists.
  • Explained Joseph Williams v. Mark Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Freddie Mae Young v. Harry J. Mobley, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.
  • Young v. Mobley 923 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/04), (citing Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Daniel E. Collins v. Dien Duc Huynh, Mohammed Ali Makki La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Collins v. Huynh 891 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004