Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite DeSoto v. DeSoto, 893 So. 2d 175.

21 citing documents.

Gwendolyn Diamond v. Decarrious Byrcious Jenkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Bart Timothy Bordelon v. Jamie Lynn Difrancesco Bordelon La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
App. 3 Cir. 2/2/05), -80 (trial court used Worksheet A when father exercised 45% custody); Broussard v. Rogers, 10-593, p. 6 (La.
Leanne Bridges v. James Bridges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 2/2/05), found that the provisions of La.Civ.Code art. 136 regarding visitation did not apply since the parents were under a joint custody decree, and therefore, the Bergeron standard applied.
Levi Austin Malone v. Brianne Leialoha Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 2/2/05), Int’l Fid.
Jamie Killian Coody v. John Allen Coody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 2/2/05), Francois v. Leon, 02-460 (La.App.
Int'l Fid. Ins. Co. v. Durham 261 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
International Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Charla Durham A/K/A Charla Holsomback La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Laa Shoring, LLC 223 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mendoza v. Mendoza 170 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/2/05) , , the father had custody of the child 45 percent of the time, and the mother had custody of the child 55 percent of the time.
Craig Wilson Cole v. Joy Teressa Bonnette Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/2/05), the parties had a custody agreement that provided for a 54.5/45.5 split in custodial time.
Cole v. Cole 139 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/2/05) , , the parties had a custody agreement that provided for a 54.5/45.5 split in custodial time.
David Landry v. City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Landry v. City of Scott 40 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Rachelle Starrett Preuett v. Ira Anderson Preuett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/2/05), Francois v. Leon, 02-460 (La.App.
Tommie Mack Granger v. Stephanie W. Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/2/05), Francois v. Leon, 02-460 (La.App.
Granger v. Granger 25 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 3 Cir. 2/2/05), ; Francois v. Leon, 02-460 (La.App.
Martello v. Martello 960 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3rd Cir.2/2/05), , the court found that a 45.5 percent to 54.5 percent split of physical custody constituted a shared custody arrangement triggering application of the statute, and yet approved the trial court's deviation from the statutory guidelines.
Janney v. Janney 943 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3rd Cir.2/2/05), , and include housing expenses, utilities, a bedroom for the child, and toys.
Leslie Moran Harris v. Jerry L. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/2/05), Francois v. Leon, 02-0460 (La.App.
Jackson v. Harris 918 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/2/05) , ; Francois v. Leon, 02-0460 (La.App.
Cedotal v. Cedotal 927 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005