Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glod v. Baker, 899 So. 2d 642.

23 citing documents.

McDonald v. Orr Motors of Little Rock, Inc. 256 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 03/23/05), , writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
The Congregation of the Immaculate Conception Roman Catholic Church of the Parish of Calcasieu v. Sam Istre Construction, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/23/05), writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
Congregation of the Immaculate Conception Roman Catholic Church of the Parish of Calcasieu v. Sam Istre Constr., Inc. 253 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 3/23/05) , , writ denied , 05-1574 (La.
Adcock v. Wooten 180 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
3d Cir.3/23/05), , writ denied, 05-1574 (La.1/13/06), .
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Michael Dole, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/23/05), [, writ denied, 05–1574 (La.1/13/06), ] “A trade practice is considered unfair when it offends established public policy and when it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious to consumers.” Laurents v. L
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Dole 165 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/23/05), [, writ denied, 05-1574 (La.1/13/06), ] “A trade practice is considered unfair when it offends established public policy and when it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious to consumers.” Laurents v. La.
Harp v. Autrey 121 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 3/23/05) , , writ denied, 2005-1574 (La.1/13/06), .
Mille S. McFadden v. Import One, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/23/05), [, writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
McFadden v. Import One, Inc. 56 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/23/05), [, unit denied, 05-1574 (La.1/13/06), ] “A trade practice is considered unfair when it offends established public policy and when it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious to consumers.” Laurents v. La.
Gunderson v. F.A. Richard & Associates 44 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/23/05), , cited by First Health in support of its position, this court explained that: “Conduct that violates the Unfair Trade Practices Act must involve fraud, misrepresentation, deception, or unethical conduct.” Id.
Clark Gunderson, M.D. v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/23/05), cited by First Health in support of its position, this court explained that: “Conduct that violates the Unfair Trade Practices Act must involve fraud, misrepresentation, deception, or unethical conduct.” Id.
Wayne Antee and Sandree Antee v. Oupac, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/23/05), writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
Antee v. Oupac, Inc. 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/23/05), , writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
Miller v. Conagra, Inc. 991 So. 2d 445 La. 2008
3 Cir. 3/23/05), ; Capital House Pres.
Gary L. Miller v. Conagra, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/23/05), writ denied, 05-1574 (La.
Miller v. ConAgra, Inc. 970 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/23/05) , , writ denied, *1273 05-1574 (La.1/13/06), .
David Brown and Karen Brown v. Douglas Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Brown v. Romero 922 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Billie Jean Gilbert and Joseph Gilbert v. Marlow Reynoso La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Gilbert v. Reynoso 917 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Baker v. Verret 899 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), , the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Baker v. Verret 899 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), , the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey 899 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), , the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by