DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vollm, 887 So. 2d 664.

41 citing documents.

  • State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 3 Cir. 11/10/04), , 670, where the defendant's two consecutive 32-year sentences for two counts of attempted first degree murder were upheld when two police officers were shot during the course of an investigatory stop; and State v. Johnson , 11-1320, (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 3 Cir. 11/10/04); where the defendant’s two consecutive 32-year sentences for two counts of attempted first degree murder were upheld when two police officers were shot during the course of an investigatory stop; and State v. Johnson, 11-1320, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir 11/10/04), State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerald C. Fowler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir 11/10/04), State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State v. Fowler 114 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    *657 App. 3 Cir 11/10/04), ; State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Phillip A. Cooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Cooks 111 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Philip A. Geraci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s
  • State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge‟s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant‟s criminal record, the severity or viol
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or viol
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), , “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger the defendant poses to t
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Dorsey 58 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir 11/10/04), State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Bruce D. Dial La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir 11/10/04), State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State v. Dial 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir 11/10/04), ; State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cory Reginald Shepherd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger t
  • State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Shepherd 11 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), , “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger the defendant poses to t
  • State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul D. Massey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Massey 999 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), this court stated that the defendant’s failure to present the issue of the consecutive nature of his sentences in his motion to reconsider relegated him to a bare claim of constitutional excessiveness on appeal.
  • State v. E.P.C. 980 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 10/10/2004), ], the Court would indicate that in this situation the court found that there were a minimum of two, possibly three victims, multiple victims, who were involved in the abuse submitted or put upon them by the defendant in this situation.
  • State v. Hawkins 968 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), “The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge’s discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including the defendant’s criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger the defendant poses t
  • State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), , "The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that although concurrent sentencing is favored, it is within the trial judge's discretion to impose sentences consecutively based on factors including *149 the defendant's criminal record, the severity or violent nature of the crimes, or the danger the defendant poses
  • State v. Davis 947 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir 11/10/04), ; State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Derick Dewayne Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir 11/10/04), State v. Day, 05-287 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), this court stated that the defendant’s failure to present the issue of the consecutive nature of his sentences in his motion to reconsider relegated him to a bare claim of constitutional excessiveness on appeal.
  • State v. Runyon 944 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/10/04) , , this court stated that the defendant's failure to present the issue of the consecutive nature of his sentences in his motion to reconsider relegated him to a bare claim of constitutional excessiveness on appeal.
  • State v. Touchet 931 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/10/04) , ; State v. Loyden, 04-1558 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/10/04), State v. Loyden, 04-1558 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul E. Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Day 915 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Loyden 899 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Booker Earl Loyden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005