Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alexander v. Autozone, Inc., 889 So. 2d 366.
- Michael Thibodeaux v. St. Mary Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- Debra White v. Wis International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- White v. WIS International 230 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Patrick Jack v. Union Tank Car Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 12/10/14), this court outlined what must be proved under the clear and convincing burden of proof: “Clear and convincing evidence requires the employee „demonstrate that the existence of a disputed fact is highly probable [or] much more probable than its nonexistence.‟” Alexander v. Autozone, Inc., 04–871, p. 6 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/8/04)
-
Jack v. Union Tank Car Co.
206 So. 3d 1134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 12/10/14), , this court outlined what must be proved under the clear and convincing burden of proof: “Clear and convincing evidence requires the employee ‘demonstrate that the existence of a disputed fact is highly probable [or] much more probable than its nonexistence.’ ” Alexander v. Autozone, Inc., 04-871, p. 6 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/8/04), .
-
Carol Thomas v. Lafayette Parish School System
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“Clear and convincing evidence requires the employee ‘demonstrate that the existence of a disputed fact is highly probable [or] much more probable than its nonexistence.’” Alexander v. Autozone, Inc., 04-871, p. 6 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/8/04)
-
Thomas v. Lafayette Parish School System
158 So. 3d 67
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Clear and convincing evidence requires the employee ‘demonstrate that the existence of a disputed fact is highly probable [or] much more probable than its nonexistence.’” Alexander v. Autozone, Inc., 04-871, p. 6 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/8/04), .
- Rose Guffey v. Louisiana Retailers Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Guffey v. Acadiana Computer System, Inc. 81 So. 3d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Day v. Superior Derrick Services 80 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Joseph H. Fontenot, Jr. v. Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Fontenot v. Wal-Mart 5 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Fred Ducote v. Louisiana Industries, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 12/8/04), Belaire v. Don Shetler Olds Buick Chevrolet, 02-1152 (La.App.
-
Ducote v. Louisiana Industries, Inc.
980 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 12/8/04), ; Belaire v. Don Shetler Olds Buick Chevrolet, 02-1152 (La.App.
- Chester J. Frederick v. Port Aggregates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Frederick v. Port Aggregates, Inc. 968 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Smith v. Town of Olla 966 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Elaine Smith v. Town of Olla La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Lambert v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 945 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Cheryl Lambert v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Roussell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 943 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
Clifton Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 12/8/04), (alteration in original); La.R.S.
-
Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc.
916 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 12/8/04) , (alteration in original); La.R.S.