Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Grant, 887 So. 2d 596.

66 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Wilfred Greenup La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), in support of these statements.
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), , 598.
State v. Woods 263 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), .
State v. Chirlow 260 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), , 598 ; State v. Shelby , 16-634 (La.
State v. Nevers-Hawkins 229 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), .
State v. Wiley 216 So. 3d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hicks 213 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04); .
State v. Sayles 206 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hutchinson 190 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
State v. Wilson 167 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , , this Court noted that it had the authority to correct an illegally lenient sentence, even though neither party had raised the issue below or on appeal; however, that authority is permissive rather than mandatory.
State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , (emphasis as found in original).
State v. James 136 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Ruffin 131 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Drewery 108 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Davis 105 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Granger 103 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bradley 99 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), .
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cortez 98 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Cox 93 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Thomas 81 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , ; State v. England, 38 So.3d at 391 .
State v. Fullilove 81 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , , and State v. Collins, 04-751 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 78 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Parker 71 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Massey 71 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Naquin 61 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payne 59 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 59 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis in original).
State v. Thomas 54 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis in original).
State v. Stokes 50 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , (emphasis in original).
State v. Davis 45 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis in original).
State v. Williams 47 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Harrell 40 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), ; State v. Thomas, 07-940, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Mazique 40 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. England 38 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. England 38 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Richardson 33 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/26/04), , this Court noted that it had the authority to correct an illegally lenient sentence, despite the fact that neither party had raised the issue below or on appeal, but that such authority is permissive rather than mandatory and noted this Court has, on occasion, declined to remand for imposition of a mandatory fi
State v. Evans 30 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis in original).
State v. Williams 30 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Welch 28 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Fontenberry 27 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (applying the Campbell prohibition to “not disturb [the defendant’s] sentences.”); State v. Thomas, 07-940, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. McGee 24 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Campbell 15 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Smith 1 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04), .
State v. Moran 1 So. 3d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 10/26/04), (emphasis as found in original).
State v. Young 984 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 10/26/04) , (emphasis added).