Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Arita, 900 So. 2d 37.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.B. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State v. Priest 265 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied , 05-0843 (La.
State ex rel. M.K 261 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5 Cir. 3/1/05), , 45, which held that latent fingerprints lifted from a crime scene are not testimonial in nature and thus not hearsay evidence.
State v. Kenner 106 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-843 (La.11/29/05), .
State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-843 (La.
State v. Parks 977 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-843 (La.
State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
App. 5th Cir.3/1/05), (holding that gap in chain of custody concerning the transportation of the latent print to the crime lab was insufficient to rebut finding that the print was connected to the case), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/05), .
State v. Taylor 973 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-0843 (La.11/29/05), .
State v. Housley 922 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Leonard 910 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , where this Court held that a latent fingerprint was non-testimonial hearsay.