Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hensley, 900 So. 2d 1.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Tonny J Bauer La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    App. 5 Cir. 3/1/05), writ denied, 05-823 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Gilbert J. Burciaga La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 5 Cir. 3/1/05), writ denied, 05-823 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Jose M. Sagastume La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    App. 5 Cir. 03/01/05), writ denied, 05-823 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 3/1/05); writ denied, 05- 0823 (La.
  • State ex rel. Hensley v. State 192 So. 3d 726 La. 2016
    5 Cir. 3/1/05); ; writs denied, 05-K-823 (La.6/17/05); .
  • State v. Burse 169 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Mazique 40 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Nelson 39 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 3/1/05), -14 , writ denied, 05-823 (La.6/17/05), ; [4] and State v. Thomas, 04-1341, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 3/1/05), -14 , writ denied, 05-823 (La.6/17/05), ; 4 and State v. Thomas, 04-1341, pp. 15-16 (La.App.
  • State v. Raymond 13 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 3/1/05), , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Darensbourg 948 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Weatherspoon 948 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , writ denied, 05-0823 (La.6/17/05), .
  • State v. Thomas 904 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 3/1/05) , , this Court noted on its error patent review that there was a "potential issue" regard the sufficiency of the evidence at the multiple bill hearing in that the record did not reflect the underlying offense was committed within ten years of the discharge date of the next predicate conviction.