Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Egle v. Egle, 923 So. 2d 780.

47 citing documents.

Daneric Anderson v. Kenneth Briggs, Abc Insurance Company, Ports America Louisiana, L.L.C., Xyz Insurance Company, and Jkl Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 3 Cir. 2/8/06), the Third Circuit held that the notation “Denied” written on the rule to show cause order did not constitute a valid judgment.
Hidden Grove, LLC v. Richard Brauns and Leslie Brauns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/8/06), due to the lack of a valid judgment disposing of the motion for new trial and 2) why the appeal should not be dismissed due to the lack of proper decretal language in the final judgment which was rendered on August 19, 2018.
Aline Waterman v. Acadiana Mall Cmbs, LLC D/B/A the Mall of Acadiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/8/06), writ denied, 07-1596 (La.
Waterman v. Acadiana Mall CMBS, LLC 269 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , writ denied , 07-1596 (La.
Lindley Scott Holleman v. Natalie Louise Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Aline Waterman v. Acadiana Mall Cmbs, LLC D/B/A/ the Mall of Acadiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Melody P. Smith v. Circle K Stores, Inc. and Ace American Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Smith v. Circle K Stores, Inc. 248 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Oliver Liecht McMickens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Succession of Theodule Noel v. Catherine Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court held that the notation “Denied,” written across a proposed order for a hearing which had been attached to a motion for new trial is insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that a final judgment be “identified as such by appropriate language.” See La.Code Civ.P.
Melody P. Smith v. Circle K Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Smith v. Circle K Stores, Inc. 215 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Alfrieda Onezime Mason v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Michael Walker v. the Service Companies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Walker v. Service Companies 200 So. 3d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Patricia Bell v. Carencro Nursing Home, Inc., D/B/A Evangeline Oaks Guest House La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Alfrieda Onezime Mason v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court held that the notation “Denied,” written across a rule to show cause order which had been attached to a motion for new trial was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that a final judgment be “identified as such by appropriate language.” See La.Code Civ.P.
Leonard Bob, Jr. v. Kasey Addison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Succession of Scheuermann ex rel. Gonzalez v. Scheuermann & Jones LLC ex rel. Jones 171 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/8/06), (“The appellate court may dismiss an appeal on its own motion where there is no right to appeal.”).
Ramirez v. Evonir, LLC 165 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/8/06), (“The appellate court may dismiss an appeal on its own motion where there is no right to appeal.”).
John Aaron Duhon v. 3-D Sugar Farms, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/8/06), has now been satisfied.
Duhon v. 3-D Sugar Farms, Inc. 82 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , has now been satisfied.
Leslie Schilling v. Lynn W. Aurich, ph.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Project Build a Future and Habitat for Humanity: Calcasieu Area, Inc. v. Block Builders, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/8/06), : "[a] final judgment shall be identified as such by appropriate language."
Ashley Carruth Fowler v. Richard Tison and Marie Tison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court held when a trial court denies an order to set a motion for new trial for contradictory hearing, the trial court is not issuing a ruling on the merits of the motion for new trial and that an appeal taken prior to a ruling on the motion for new trial is premature.
Raymond Leger v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Leger v. IMPERIAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 25 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation "Denied" written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Dalton John Meaux v. Elizabeth Hensgens Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06), the statutory requirement set forth in La.Code Civ.P.
GOTCH v. Robin 10 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation "Denied" written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Tamika Gotch v. Odel P. Robin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Robinson v. Meaux 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , this court held that the notation "Denied" written across a rule to show cause order which had been attached to a motion for new trial was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that a final judgment be "identified as such by appropriate language."
Louis Robinson, Jr. v. Tylan Meaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court held that the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order which had been attached to a motion for new trial was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement 1 that a final judgment be “identified as such by appropriate language.” See La.C
METCLAF v. Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Richard Le v. Nitetown, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court considered the issue of whether the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Guadalupe Trevino Camacho v. Susan Fontenot Camacho La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ledoux v. Ledoux 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Landry 966 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , this court held that the notation "Denied" written across a rule to show cause order which had been attached to a motion for new trial was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that a final judgment be "identified as such by appropriate language."
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court held that the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order which had been attached to a motion for new trial was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that a final judgment be “identified as such by appropriate language.” See La.Code Civ.P.
John Keith Richard v. Lafayette Fire and Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Ronnie Henry Cleary v. Kerry M. Owens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/8/06), this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Cleary v. Owens 966 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/8/06) , , this court previously considered the issue of whether the notation “Denied” written across a rule to show cause order is sufficient to constitute a judgment on a motion for new trial.
Richard v. LAFAYETTE FIRE AND POLICE BD. 966 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Rose Dove Egle v. John M. Egle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Egle v. Egle 963 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Shirley Dufour v. River City Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Rose Dove Egle v. John M. Egle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Douglas N. Zuberbier v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006