Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating Co., 926 So. 2d 158.

13 citing documents.

  • Paris Madison v. Richard Stalder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
  • Madison v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 124 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , this court set forth the appellate standard of review applicable to a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and ev
  • State of La. O/B/O Ranetta J. Jackson & Austin C. Jackson v. Brent C. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
  • State ex rel. Jackson v. Jackson 110 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , this court set forth the appellate standard of review applicable to a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and ev
  • Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Flowers Baking Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, [06-1033] (La.6/23/06), this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and
  • Zeno v. Flowers Baking Co. 62 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, [06— 1033] (La.6/23/06), , this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and evaluated in the tr
  • Chrishon v. Marshall 994 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 4/5/06) , , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), .
  • James Roy Chrishon v. Louis J. Marshall, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
  • Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
    3 Cir. 4/5/06) , , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), .
  • Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , wherein the court stated: Sonnier [,the plaintiff's employer,] asserts that the jurisprudential definition *115 of solidarity does not apply to Sonnier and [the plaintiff's] UM insurer, State Farm.
  • Eugene Bellard v. American Central Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06- 1033 (La.
  • Dave Beach v. Peter Scalfano Enterprises La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, (La.
  • Beach v. Peter Scalfano Enterprises 949 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, (La.6/23/06), , this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[wjhen evidence is introduced and evaluated in the trial court o