Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating Co., 926 So. 2d 158.
-
Paris Madison v. Richard Stalder
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
-
Madison v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections
124 So. 3d 1219
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , this court set forth the appellate standard of review applicable to a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and ev
-
State of La. O/B/O Ranetta J. Jackson & Austin C. Jackson v. Brent C. Jackson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
-
State ex rel. Jackson v. Jackson
110 So. 3d 597
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , this court set forth the appellate standard of review applicable to a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and ev
-
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Flowers Baking Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, [06-1033] (La.6/23/06), this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and
-
Zeno v. Flowers Baking Co.
62 So. 3d 303
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, [06— 1033] (La.6/23/06), , this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[w]hen evidence is introduced and evaluated in the tr
-
Chrishon v. Marshall
994 So. 2d 585
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 4/5/06) , , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), .
-
James Roy Chrishon v. Louis J. Marshall, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06-1033 (La.
-
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
980 So. 2d 654
La. 2008
3 Cir. 4/5/06) , , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), .
-
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
958 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, 06-1033 (La.6/23/06), , wherein the court stated: Sonnier [,the plaintiff's employer,] asserts that the jurisprudential definition *115 of solidarity does not apply to Sonnier and [the plaintiff's] UM insurer, State Farm.
-
Eugene Bellard v. American Central Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, 06- 1033 (La.
-
Dave Beach v. Peter Scalfano Enterprises
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/5/06), writ denied, (La.
-
Beach v. Peter Scalfano Enterprises
949 So. 2d 653
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/5/06), , writ denied, (La.6/23/06), , this court discussed appellate review relative to an exception of prescription stating as follows: Ordinarily, when an appeal involves a ruling on a peremptory exception with contested issues of fact and “[wjhen evidence is introduced and evaluated in the trial court o